Oppo Find X9s Pro vs Honor Magic 8 Pro

91 out of 100
Oppo Find X9s Pro
VS
93 out of 100
Honor Magic 8 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.32-inch Oppo Find X9s Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on April 21, 2026, against the Honor Magic 8 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9s Pro
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.1)
  • Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
  • The phone is 6 months newer
  • Weighs 21 grams less
Reasons to consider the Honor Magic 8 Pro
  • Delivers 376% higher peak brightness (5231 against 1099 nits)
  • The rear camera has a 3.7x optical zoom
  • Has a 0.39 inch larger screen size
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 80W)
  • 21% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3966K versus 3274K)
  • 8% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3568 and 3302 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Oppo Find X9s Pro and Honor Magic 8 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
67.0
(Good)
Value Index
40.0
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.32 inches 6.71 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2640 pixels 1256 x 2808 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 460 ppi 458 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3600 nits 6000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz -
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Giant Rhino Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.9% 89.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.4% -
PWM 167 Hz -
Response time 3 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Magic 8 Pro
6.71″ (20:9 ratio) = 16.8 in2
Find X9s Pro
6.32″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.2 in2
~10% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1099 nits
Magic 8 Pro +376%
5231 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 150.5 mm (5.93 inches) 161.15 mm (6.34 inches)
Width 71.7 mm (2.82 inches) 75 mm (2.95 inches)
Thickness 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) 8.32 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 198 g (6.98 oz) 219 g (7.72 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Gray, Blue, Orange White, Black, Gold, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.41/5)
Drop resistance - Very good (B) · 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
90.9%
89.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Oppo Find X9s Pro and Honor Magic 8 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 4210 MHz 4610 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Oppo Find X9s Pro and Honor Magic 8 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3568
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 27643
Single-core score 3302 3568
Multi-core score 10598 10610
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3274090
3966144
CPU 909385 1207069
GPU 1204662 1513881
Memory 403028 461553
UX 757015 783641
Total score 3274090 3966144
Samples Less than 3 [4 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Graphics test - 22 FPS
Graphics score - 2979
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 47 FPS
Section 1 - 56 FPS
Section 2 - 46 FPS
Section 3 - 40 FPS
Graphics score - 12492
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 22533
Video editing - 8214
Photo editing - 40028
Data manipulation - 17118
Writing score - 30415
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (58th and 22nd place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Oppo Find X9s Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-27 (zwatoo)AnTuTu 113274090
Honor Magic 8 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-18 (S_zavtra)AnTuTu 124123403
📘 2026-07-19 (WatchingTV)AnTuTu 114000373
📘 2026-07-18 (WatchingTV)AnTuTu 113966144
📘 2026-07-07 (carrrpernaxa)AnTuTu 113649917
📘 2026-06-25 -> LyncosAnTuTu 112869245

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM ColorOS 16 MagicOS 10
OS size 58 GB -
OS updates 5 years 7 years
Security updates 6 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7025 mAh 7200 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (80 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes (81% in 30 min)
Full charging time - 0:40 hr
Battery cycles - 1600 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 14:24 hr
Watching video - 24:12 hr
Gaming - 08:32 hr
Standby - 116 hr
General battery life
32:06 hr

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution - 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2.8x Optical, 3.7x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 240FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 480 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 122°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP9 Omnivision OV50H
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size - 1.2 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.6
Focal length 65 mm 85 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP5 Samsung ISOCELL HP9
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size - 0.56 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 12 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL JN5 Omnivision OV50D
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size - 0.61 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 165
Zoom - 155
Samples - Photo samples of Honor Magic 8 Pro from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution - 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm 21 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX816
Sensor size - 1/2.93" (≈ 0.34 inch)
Pixel size - 0.6 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No Yes

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.1 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes, DP 1.2
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - No
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced April 2026 October 2025
Release date May 2026 October 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $780 $999
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Yes, 120 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, connectivity, and software are more important to you, then choose the Honor Magic 8 Pro. But if the battery life and sound are more of a priority – go for the Oppo Find X9s Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
3 (27.3%)
8 (72.7%)
Total votes: 11

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!