Vivo S50 Pro mini vs iQOO 15
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo S50 Pro mini (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5) that was released on December 15, 2025, against the Vivo iQOO 15, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo S50 Pro mini
- Weighs 29 grams less
- Better grip in hands – the body is 5.04 mm narrower
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 15
- Has a 0.54 inch larger screen size
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- 33% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3950K versus 2974K)
- 10% higher pixel density (508 vs 461 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
- 18% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3584 and 3029 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.31 inches | 6.85 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1440 x 3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 461 ppi | 508 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | - | 2600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 6000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | - | 100% |
| PWM | - | 561 Hz |
| Response time | - | 1 ms |
| Contrast | - | ∞ Infinity |
Screen space comparison
iQOO 15
6.85″ (20:9 ratio) = 17.6 in2
S50 Pro mini
6.31″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~15% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 150.83 mm (5.94 inches) | 163.65 mm (6.44 inches) |
| Width | 71.76 mm (2.83 inches) | 76.8 mm (3.02 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm (0.32 inches) | 8.1 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Purple | White, Black, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max clock | 3840 MHz | 4610 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.32 GHz: Oryon Performance - 2 cores at 3.8 GHz: Oryon Prime |
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 829 | Adreno 840 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1225 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2508.8 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 27247 |
| Single-core score | 3029 | 3584 |
| Multi-core score | 9401 | 11143 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 869186 | 1112833 |
| GPU | 1016895 | 1494722 |
| Memory | 392372 | 442350 |
| UX | 695748 | 900177 |
| Total score | 2974201 | 3950082 |
| Samples | [4 tests] | [24 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 54% |
| Graphics test | - | 21 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 2806 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 46 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 52 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 46 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 40 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 12156 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | - | 40 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 6752 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 14169 |
| Video editing | - | 6652 |
| Photo editing | - | 35337 |
| Data manipulation | - | 14682 |
| Writing score | - | 29367 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (104th and 20th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo S50 Pro mini
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-10 -> Ruddy3410 | Battery life | SOT 8:29 / 16:30 |
| 📘 2026-08-10 -> Ruddy3410 | CPU Throttle | 83% |
| 📘 2026-08-10 -> Ruddy3410 | AnTuTu | 2974201 |
| 📘 2026-07-18 (Quỳnh) | AnTuTu | 3185790 |
| 📘 2026-04-17 -> Ruddy3410 | AnTuTu | 2902731 |
Vivo iQOO 15
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-11 (Rtesh) | AnTuTu | 3886893 |
| 📘 2026-09-10 (Ranit) | AnTuTu | 3974227 |
| 📘 2026-08-07 (tt:shikazik) | AnTuTu | 4017492 |
| 📘 2026-07-17 (Skarvinarn) | AnTuTu | 3902163 |
| 📘 2026-07-03 (cA27) | AnTuTu | 4140036 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | OriginOS 6 |
| OS size | - | 57 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 5 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (48% in 30 min) | Yes (60% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:58 hr | 0:52 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 18:52 hr |
| Watching video | - | 27:27 hr |
| Gaming | - | 09:04 hr |
| Standby | - | 147 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#4th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 110° | 107° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Sony IMX921 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | - | 15 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | - | GalaxyCore GC32E1 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | December 2025 | October 2025 |
| Release date | December 2025 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $525 | $699 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo iQOO 15 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 26
Related comparisons
8.
Vivo iQOO 15 vs OnePlus 15 (5)