Vivo T4 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 14
76
out of 100
VS
72
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Vivo T4 Ultra (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 11, 2025, against the Oppo Reno 14, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8350 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo T4 Ultra
- 33% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2286K versus 1724K)
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
- 71% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2252 and 1319 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 14
- The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.59 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1256 x 2760 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | 600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 88.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 160.56 mm (6.32 inches) | 157.9 mm (6.22 inches) |
| Width | 75 mm (2.95 inches) | 74.73 mm (2.94 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.45 mm (0.29 inches) | 7.42 mm (0.29 inches) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP64 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | - | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | Gold, Gray | White, Black, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Good (3.74/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Very good (B) Β· 180 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 |
| Max clock | 3400 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 14713 | 8534 |
| Single-core score | 2252 | 1319 |
| Multi-core score | 6749 | 4067 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 728686 | 514672 |
| GPU | 750320 | 480538 |
| Memory | 291780 | 275946 |
| UX | 516022 | 453601 |
| Total score | 2286808 | 1724757 |
| Samples | [3 tests] | [14 tests] |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#200th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo T4 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-25 (Purushotam Prajapat) | AnTuTu 12 | 2403705 |
| π 2026-08-19 (Olliver1006) | AnTuTu 11 | 2348248 |
| π 2026-02-09 (Forhad) | AnTuTu 11 | 1890510 |
| π 2026-01-06 (Bumble bee) | AnTuTu 11 | 2286808 |
Oppo Reno 14
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-19 (K) | AnTuTu 11 | 1656870 |
| π 2026-06-20 (Vishal) | AnTuTu 11 | 1588535 |
| π 2026-06-13 (Wal) | AnTuTu 11 | 1732207 |
| π 2026-04-28 (Jj_Cnstn) | AnTuTu 11 | 1743814 |
| π 2026-04-15 (Gabriel Pereira) | AnTuTu 11 | 1724757 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | Funtouch OS 15 | ColorOS 15 |
| OS updates | - | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 20 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:48 hr | 0:50 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1600 cycles |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120Β° | 116Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 80 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.6 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 15 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | - | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.6 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | June 2025 | May 2025 |
| Release date | June 2025 | May 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $450 | $400 |
| Successor | - | - Oppo Reno 15 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance and gaming are more important to you, then choose the Vivo T4 Ultra. But if the battery life and design are more of a priority β go for the Oppo Reno 14.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 4