Vivo T4 Ultra vs T3 Ultra
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Vivo T4 Ultra (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 11, 2025, against the Vivo T3 Ultra, which is powered by Mediatek Dimensity 9200 Plus and came out 9 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo T4 Ultra
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- 22% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2286K versus 1870K)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
- 10% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2252 and 2054 points
- The phone is 9 months newer
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Vivo T3 Ultra
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | 4500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 90.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 160.56 mm (6.32 inches) | 164.16 mm (6.46 inches) |
| Width | 75 mm (2.95 inches) | 74.93 mm (2.95 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.45 mm (0.29 inches) | 7.58 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP64 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | - | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Gold, Gray | Gray, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 Plus |
| Max clock | 3400 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-X3 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | MediaTek APU 690 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1408 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~3238.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 14713 | 11130 |
| Single-core score | 2252 | 2054 |
| Multi-core score | 6749 | 5471 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 728686 | 616771 |
| GPU | 750320 | 516517 |
| Memory | 291780 | 251382 |
| UX | 516022 | 485515 |
| Total score | 2286808 | 1870185 |
| Samples | [3 tests] | [3 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | - | 10 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 1411 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 22 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 25 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 23 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 19 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 5769 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#200th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo T4 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-25 (Purushotam Prajapat) | AnTuTu 12 | 2403705 |
| π 2026-08-19 (Olliver1006) | AnTuTu 11 | 2348248 |
| π 2026-02-09 (Forhad) | AnTuTu 11 | 1890510 |
| π 2026-01-06 (Bumble bee) | AnTuTu 11 | 2286808 |
Vivo T3 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-22 (Hridoy) | AnTuTu 11 | 1840815 |
| π 2026-01-24 (Malayali) | AnTuTu 11 | 1913837 |
| π 2025-11-25 (Vivo t3 ultra) | AnTuTu 11 | 1870185 |
| π 2024-10-16 (Seera) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2054 / 5471 |
| π 2024-10-11 (Utkarsh Prajapati) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 11130 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | - | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| ROM | Funtouch OS 15 | Funtouch 14 |
Battery
| Capacity | 5500 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 20 min) | Yes (70% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:48 hr | 0:47 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 120Β° | 120Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Sony IMX921 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | - |
| Focal length | 85 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | - | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | June 2025 | September 2024 |
| Release date | June 2025 | September 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $450 | $385 |
| Successor | - | - Vivo T4 Ultra |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo T4 Ultra. It has a better camera, performance, gaming, and software.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1