Vivo V60 vs Oppo Reno 14 Pro
69
out of 100
VS
77
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.77-inch Vivo V60 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4) that was released on August 12, 2025, against the Oppo Reno 14 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8450 and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo V60
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 14 Pro
- 63% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2048K versus 1257K)
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- 16% higher pixel density (450 vs 388 PPI)
- Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
- 30% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1617 and 1247 points
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.77 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels | 1272 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | - |
| PPI | 388 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1500 nits | 600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Schott Xensation Core | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | 90.1% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 163.53 mm (6.44 inches) | 163.4 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 76.96 mm (3.03 inches) | 77 mm (3.03 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.69 mm (0.3 inches) | 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | Gold, Gray, Blue | White, Black, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 |
| Max clock | 2800 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3 cores at 1.84 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-520) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-720) - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-720) |
- 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725 |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek NPU 880 |
| Graphics | Adreno 722 | Mali-G720 MP7 |
| GPU shading units | 512 | 896 |
| GPU clock | 1150 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1177.6 GFLOPS | ~2329.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 6568 | - |
| Single-core score | 1247 | 1617 |
| Multi-core score | 3557 | 6406 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 474474 | 652185 |
| GPU | 253163 | 646177 |
| Memory | 184094 | 264179 |
| UX | 346123 | 485924 |
| Total score | 1257854 | 2048465 |
| Samples | [9 tests] | [3 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 98% | - |
| Graphics test | 5 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 667 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 8850 | 24385 |
| Video editing | 6242 | 7667 |
| Photo editing | 23969 | 37896 |
| Data manipulation | 10504 | 11708 |
| Writing score | 13580 | 22929 |
Recent User Tests
Vivo V60
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| ๐ 2026-08-07 (Aman Sthapak) | AnTuTu | 1250792 |
| ๐ 2026-05-14 (CrustyName) | GeekBench GPU | 6568 |
| ๐ 2026-05-14 (CrustyName) | GeekBench CPU | 1247 / 3557 |
| ๐ 2026-03-23 (Dodi) | AnTuTu | 1231015 |
| ๐ 2026-03-21 (Dodi) | AnTuTu | 1221047 |
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| ๐ 2026-05-05 (Rutam) | AnTuTu | 2108697 |
| ๐ 2025-12-24 (DiZhร n) | AnTuTu | 2048465 |
| ๐ 2025-12-05 (DiZhร n) | AnTuTu | 1983406 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | Funtouch OS 15 | ColorOS 15 |
| OS updates | 4 years | - |
| Security updates | 6 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 6200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (61% in 30 min) | Yes (73% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:59 hr | 0:53 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120ยฐ | 116ยฐ |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (โ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.55" (โ 0.65 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 73 mm | 80 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (โ 0.51 inch) | 1/2.76" (โ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.6 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (โ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (โ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (โ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.6 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 18 | - |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | August 2025 | May 2025 |
| Release date | August 2025 | May 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $425 | $550 |
| Successor | - Vivo V70 | - Oppo Reno 15 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 80 W |
Further details
Notes on Vivo V60:
- Gold version weighs 200 g, blue 201 g, and the gray one is the lightest at 192 g. The heavier models use a glass back, while the gray version has a plastic one.
- Supports Bypass Charging.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Reno 14 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 12
Related comparisons
9.
Vivo V60 vs Oppo Reno 14 (9)