Vivo V60 vs V40 5G
69
out of 100
VS
65
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.77-inch Vivo V60 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4) that was released on August 12, 2025, against the Vivo V40 5G, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and came out 1 year and 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo V60
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5500 mAh
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- 24% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1257K versus 1010K)
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
- The phone is 1 year and 2 months newer
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
- 11% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1247 and 1126 points
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Vivo V40 5G
- 17% higher pixel density (453 vs 388 PPI)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.77 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 388 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1500 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Schott Xensation Core | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | 90.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.53 mm (6.44 inches) | 164.16 mm (6.46 inches) |
| Width | 76.96 mm (3.03 inches) | 74.93 mm (2.95 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.69 mm (0.3 inches) | 7.58 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Gold, Gray, Blue | Silver, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 2800 MHz | 2630 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3 cores at 1.84 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-520) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-720) - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-720) |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715) - 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 722 | Adreno 720 |
| GPU shading units | 512 | 512 |
| GPU clock | 1150 MHz | 975 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1177.6 GFLOPS | ~998.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 6568 | 3540 |
| Single-core score | 1247 | 1126 |
| Multi-core score | 3557 | 3132 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 474474 | 400634 |
| GPU | 253163 | 213466 |
| Memory | 184094 | 156680 |
| UX | 346123 | 239928 |
| Total score | 1257854 | 1010711 |
| Samples | [9 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 98% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| Graphics score | 667 | 495 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 8850 | - |
| Video editing | 6242 | - |
| Photo editing | 23969 | - |
| Data manipulation | 10504 | - |
| Writing score | 13580 | - |
Recent User Tests
Vivo V60
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-07 (Aman Sthapak) | AnTuTu | 1250792 |
| π 2026-05-14 (CrustyName) | GeekBench GPU | 6568 |
| π 2026-05-14 (CrustyName) | GeekBench CPU | 1247 / 3557 |
| π 2026-03-23 (Dodi) | AnTuTu | 1231015 |
| π 2026-03-21 (Dodi) | AnTuTu | 1221047 |
Vivo V40 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2025-10-21 (Bryle) | AnTuTu | 1010711 |
| π 2025-03-21 (Pratama) | GeekBench GPU | 3540 |
| π 2025-03-21 (Pratama) | GeekBench CPU | 1126 / 3132 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| ROM | Funtouch OS 15 | Funtouch 14 |
| OS updates | 4 years | 2 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (61% in 30 min) | Yes (66% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:59 hr | 0:46 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 12:12 hr |
| Watching video | - | 17:26 hr |
| Gaming | - | 07:14 hr |
| Standby | - | 135 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#62nd place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120Β° | 119Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | Samsung GNJ |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | - |
| Focal length | 73 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 18 | 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | August 2025 | June 2024 |
| Release date | August 2025 | July 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $425 | $599 |
| Successor | - Vivo V70 | - Vivo V70 |
| SAR (head) | - | 0.97 W/kg |
| SAR (body) | - | 1.14 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 80 W |
Further details
Notes on Vivo V60:
- Gold version weighs 200 g, blue 201 g, and the gray one is the lightest at 192 g. The heavier models use a glass back, while the gray version has a plastic one.
- Supports Bypass Charging.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo V60. It has a better camera, performance, gaming, and software.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 20
Related comparisons
3.
Vivo V60 vs Oppo Reno 14 (9)