Home > Smartphone comparison > X200 Pro vs Find X8 Pro – which one to choose?

Vivo X200 Pro vs Oppo Find X8 Pro

84 out of 100
Vivo X200 Pro
VS
87 out of 100
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Vivo X200 Pro
Oppo Find X8 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X200 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400) that was released on October 14, 2024, against the Oppo Find X8 Pro, which is powered by the same chip. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments (3)

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Pro
  • Delivers 53% higher peak brightness (2041 against 1332 nits)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X8 Pro
  • Shows 16% longer battery life (28:59 vs 24:55 hours)
  • The rear camera has a 6x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 8% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2907 and 2686 points

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200 Pro and Oppo Find X8 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
42.1
(Average)
Value Index
47.4
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
X200 Pro
vs
Find X8 Pro

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1264 x 2780 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 452 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Armor Glass Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1% 89.2%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.7%
PWM - 86 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
X200 Pro +53%
2041 nits
Find X8 Pro
1332 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 162.36 mm (6.39 inches) 162.27 mm (6.39 inches)
Width 75.92 mm (2.99 inches) 76.67 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) 8.24 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 228 g (8.04 oz) 215 g (7.58 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Gray, Blue White, Black, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
X200 Pro +1%
90.1%
Find X8 Pro
89.2%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200 Pro and Oppo Find X8 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Max clock 3620 MHz 3630 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925		 - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925
L3 cache 12 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 MediaTek NPU 890
GPU
Graphics Immortalis-G925 MC12 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1612 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200 Pro and Oppo Find X8 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
X200 Pro
2686
Find X8 Pro +8%
2907
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
X200 Pro
8366
Find X8 Pro +8%
9045
Compute Score (GPU)
X200 Pro
21444
Find X8 Pro +16%
24839
Compute Score (GPU) 21444 24839
Single-core score 2686 2907
Multi-core score 8366 9045
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
X200 Pro
2825187
Find X8 Pro +4%
2935203
CPU 900074 897776
GPU 972096 989190
Memory 345330 417845
UX 607687 630392
Total score 2825187 2935203
Samples [22 tests] [7 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
X200 Pro
2371
Find X8 Pro +3%
2447
Stability 61% 63%
Graphics test 18 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 2371 2447
3DMark Solar Bay
X200 Pro
10432
Find X8 Pro +10%
11466
Graphics test 40 FPS 44 FPS
Section 1 44 FPS 47 FPS
Section 2 41 FPS 45 FPS
Section 3 34 FPS 38 FPS
Graphics score 10432 11466
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
X200 Pro
6122
Find X8 Pro +5%
6417
Stability 65% -
Graphics test 36 FPS 38 FPS
Graphics score 6122 6417
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
X200 Pro +2%
15327
Find X8 Pro
15020
Web score 13701 14420
Video editing 5803 6211
Photo editing 35653 30985
Data manipulation 13567 16192
Writing score 23556 19569
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (132nd and 122nd place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate)AnTuTu 123135000
📘 2026-08-01 -> DlackAnTuTu 112847396
📘 2026-08-01 (Dlack)AnTuTu 112847396
📘 2026-07-31 (Xarvis)Geekbench 6 GPU23591
📘 2026-07-31 (Xarvis)Geekbench 6 CPU2432 / 8113
Add View all (34)
Oppo Find X8 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-09 (chakzz_0)AnTuTu 112935203
📘 2026-06-20 (Casimir)AnTuTu 112421190
📘 2026-03-23 (Are damn)AnTuTu 112868741
📘 2026-03-09 (Dany)AnTuTu 112998422
📘 2026-03-02 (Flo)AnTuTu 113007264
Add View all (8)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM Funtouch OS 16 ColorOS 16
OS size - 17 GB
OS updates 3 years 4 years
Security updates 3 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 5910 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (30 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (73% in 30 min) Yes (70% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:46 hr 0:53 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:47 hr 13:16 hr
Watching video 16:41 hr 18:31 hr
Gaming 07:44 hr 07:16 hr
Standby 85 hr 120 hr
General battery life
X200 Pro
24:55 hr
Find X8 Pro +16%
28:59 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 6x
Flash Dual LED Quad LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 480 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 119° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Telephoto: 50 MP
4) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-818 Sony LYT-808
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.7 f/2.6
Focal length 85 mm 73 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP9 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 75
Preview - 78
Zoom - 155
Samples - Photo samples of Oppo Find X8 Pro from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 -
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.4
Focal length 20 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 Sony IMX615
Sensor size 1/3.42" (≈ 0.29 inch) 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
X200 Pro
n/a
Find X8 Pro
87.8 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2024 October 2024
Release date October 2024 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $847 $899
Successor - Vivo X300 Pro - Oppo Find X9 Pro
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 80 W
Further details
Notes on X200 Pro:
    - The black model is thinner (8.2 mm) and lighter (223g).
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Oppo Find X8 Pro. It has a better camera, battery life, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
369 (56.9%)
280 (43.1%)
Total votes: 649

Related comparisons

1. Vivo X200 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra (1)
2. Vivo X200 Pro vs Vivo X200 Pro mini (3)
3. Vivo X200 Pro vs OnePlus 13
4. Vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra (6)
5. Vivo X200 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (7)
6. Vivo X200 Pro vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (5)
7. Oppo Find X8 Pro vs Oppo Find X8 Ultra (3)
8. Oppo Find X8 Pro vs Honor Magic 7 Pro
9. Oppo Find X8 Pro vs Oppo Find X8
10. Oppo Find X8 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
LGs December 11, 2024 at 05:57 PM
serhii, the geekbench scores on the oppo find x8 pro are higher than they should be.
+9 Reply
Avatar
Serhii December 12, 2024 at 08:55 AM
i'll check benchmarks. Thank you.
+8 Reply
Avatar
Geekbench scores are off December 10, 2024 at 06:40 PM
For the oppo find x8 pro the Geekbench scores are way higher than they should be (from what I saw) the Multicore Score is not in the 9000
+14 Reply
EnglishРусский