Vivo X200 Ultra vs X200 Pro
87
out of 100
VS
84
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo X200 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on April 21, 2025, against the Vivo X200 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Ultra
- 13% higher pixel density (510 vs 452 PPI)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 11% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2979 and 2686 points
- The phone is 6 months newer
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Pro
- Delivers 12% higher peak brightness (2042 against 1831 nits)
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.82 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.8:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 510 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 2000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Armor glass | Armor Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90.1% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.9% | - |
| PWM | 121 Hz | - |
| Response time | 2 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.14 mm (6.42 inches) | 162.36 mm (6.39 inches) |
| Width | 76.76 mm (3.02 inches) | 75.92 mm (2.99 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.69 mm (0.34 inches) | 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 229 g (8.08 oz) | 228 g (8.04 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Red | White, Black, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| Max clock | 4320 MHz | 3620 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G925 MC12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24604 | 21444 |
| Single-core score | 2979 | 2686 |
| Multi-core score | 9353 | 8366 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 819790 | 900074 |
| GPU | 1185591 | 972096 |
| Memory | 429927 | 345330 |
| UX | 657032 | 607687 |
| Total score | 3092340 | 2825187 |
| Samples | [11 tests] | [22 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 50% | 61% |
| Graphics test | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2561 | 2371 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 45 FPS | 40 FPS |
| Section 1 | 51 FPS | 44 FPS |
| Section 2 | 46 FPS | 41 FPS |
| Section 3 | 39 FPS | 34 FPS |
| Graphics score | 11897 | 10432 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | - | 65% |
| Graphics test | - | 36 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 6122 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 15343 | 13701 |
| Video editing | 7121 | 5803 |
| Photo editing | 35679 | 35653 |
| Data manipulation | 14476 | 13567 |
| Writing score | 21329 | 23556 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (96th and 132nd place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X200 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-01 (Tt_murco730) | AnTuTu 11 | 3172230 |
| 📘 2026-06-07 (L_8888) | AnTuTu 11 | 3074394 |
| 📘 2026-06-02 (Obsessed) | AnTuTu 11 | 3179659 |
| 📘 2026-05-15 (Хзшник) | AnTuTu 11 | 3172230 |
| 📘 2026-03-29 (Tijet) | AnTuTu 11 | 3033519 |
Vivo X200 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate) | AnTuTu 12 | 3135000 |
| 📘 2026-08-01 -> Dlack | AnTuTu 11 | 2847396 |
| 📘 2026-08-01 (Dlack) | AnTuTu 11 | 2847396 |
| 📘 2026-07-31 (Xarvis) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 23591 |
| 📘 2026-07-31 (Xarvis) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2432 / 8113 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | Funtouch OS 16 |
| OS updates | - | 3 years |
| Security updates | - | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 90 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | Yes (30 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (64% in 30 min) | Yes (73% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:49 hr | 0:46 hr |
| Web browsing | 12:14 hr | 12:47 hr |
| Watching video | 14:52 hr | 16:41 hr |
| Gaming | 06:38 hr | 07:44 hr |
| Standby | 95 hr | 85 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 116° | 119° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 35 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Sony LYT-818 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 175 | - |
| Zoom | 159 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Vivo X200 Ultra from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN1 | Samsung S5KKD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/3.42" (≈ 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2025 | October 2024 |
| Release date | April 2025 | October 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1099 | $847 |
| Successor | - | - Vivo X300 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 90 W |
Further details
Notes on X200 Pro:
- The black model is thinner (8.2 mm) and lighter (223g).
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo X200 Ultra. It has a better camera, performance, gaming, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 723
