Vivo X300 Pro vs Honor Magic 8 Pro

91 out of 100
Vivo X300 Pro
VS
94 out of 100
Honor Magic 8 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X300 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 13, 2025, against the Honor Magic 8 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Honor Magic 8 Pro
  • Delivers 100% higher peak brightness (5297 against 2643 nits)
  • Shows 30% longer battery life (32:06 vs 24:37 hours)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 90W)
  • 11% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3966K versus 3587K)
  • 11% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3568 and 3228 points

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300 Pro and Honor Magic 8 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
35.9
(Mediocre)
Value Index
41.0
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.78 inches 6.71 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1256 x 2808 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 452 ppi 458 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 6000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz -
Screen protection Armor Glass Giant Rhino Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.8% 89.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.7% -
PWM 360 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
2643 nits
Magic 8 Pro +100%
5297 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 161.98 mm (6.38 inches) 161.15 mm (6.34 inches)
Width 75.48 mm (2.97 inches) 75 mm (2.95 inches)
Thickness 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) 8.32 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 226 g (7.97 oz) 219 g (7.72 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue, Brown White, Black, Gold, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3/5) Good (3.41/5)
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 180 drops Very good (B) · 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
X300 Pro +1%
90.8%
89.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300 Pro and Honor Magic 8 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 4210 MHz 4610 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.61 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1200 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~3686.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300 Pro and Honor Magic 8 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3228
3568
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
9553
10610
Compute Score (GPU)
27383
27643
Compute Score (GPU) 27383 27643
Single-core score 3228 3568
Multi-core score 9553 10610
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3587829
3966144
CPU 1046355 1207069
GPU 1382122 1513881
Memory 388628 461553
UX 770724 783641
Total score 3587829 3966144
Samples [28 tests] [4 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
X300 Pro +2%
3036
Stability 53% -
Graphics test 22 FPS 22 FPS
Graphics score 3036 2979
3DMark Solar Bay
X300 Pro +7%
13426
12492
Graphics test 51 FPS 47 FPS
Section 1 57 FPS 56 FPS
Section 2 51 FPS 46 FPS
Section 3 45 FPS 40 FPS
Graphics score 13426 12492
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
16703
20789
Web score 14329 22533
Video editing 6016 8214
Photo editing 36698 40028
Data manipulation 14869 17118
Writing score 25904 30415
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (34th and 19th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X300 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix)CPU Throttle81%
📘 2026-09-03 (chapix)AnTuTu3935655
📘 2026-08-28 -> Rlamac012AnTuTu3729488
📘 2026-08-16 (chapix)AnTuTu3884886
📘 2026-07-30 (ria)AnTuTu3617138
Honor Magic 8 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-19 (WatchingTV)AnTuTu4000373
📘 2026-07-18 (WatchingTV)AnTuTu3966144
📘 2026-07-07 (carrrpernaxa)AnTuTu3649917
📘 2026-06-25 -> LyncosAnTuTu2869245
📘 2026-04-15 (Nam Le)GeekBench CPU3568 / 10610

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM OriginOS 6 MagicOS 10
OS size 37 GB -
OS updates 5 years 7 years
Security updates 7 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 6510 mAh 7200 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (80 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (55% in 24 min) Yes (81% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:50 hr 0:40 hr
Battery cycles 1200 cycles 1600 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 13:30 hr 14:24 hr
Watching video 15:47 hr 24:12 hr
Gaming 07:14 hr 08:32 hr
Standby 81 hr 116 hr
General battery life
24:37 hr
32:06 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 3.7x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119° 122°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.6
Focal length 24 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-828 Omnivision OV50H
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1.2 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/2.7 f/2.6
Focal length 85 mm 85 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPB Samsung ISOCELL HP9
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.56 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 12 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Omnivision OV50D
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.61 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
X300 Pro +1%
171
Video quality
X300 Pro +10%
169
Generic main camera score
X300 Pro +4%
171
Bokeh 180 165
Zoom 159 155
Samples Photo samples of Vivo X300 Pro from DxOMark Photo samples of Honor Magic 8 Pro from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Sony IMX816
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.93" (≈ 0.34 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.6 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No Yes

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes, DP 1.2
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No
Speakers test
Max loudness
91.8 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 October 2025
Release date October 2025 October 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $899 $999
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 120 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the battery life and software are more important to you, then choose the Honor Magic 8 Pro. But if the sound is more of a priority – go for the Vivo X300 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
163 (24.2%)
510 (75.8%)
Total votes: 673

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Rrdchhcd May 31, 2026 at 04:42 PM
Honor better than vivo
0 Reply