Home > Smartphone comparison > X300 Pro vs X200 Pro – which one to choose?

Vivo X300 Pro vs X200 Pro

90 out of 100
Vivo X300 Pro
VS
84 out of 100
Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo X200 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X300 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 13, 2025, against the Vivo X200 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and came out 1 year before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments (3)

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Pro
  • Delivers 30% higher peak brightness (2662 against 2042 nits)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • 27% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3587K versus 2825K)
  • The phone is 1 year newer
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • 20% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3228 and 2686 points

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300 Pro and X200 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
35.0
(Mediocre)
Value Index
42.1
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
X300 Pro
vs
X200 Pro

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 452 ppi 452 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Armor Glass Armor Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.8% 90.1%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.7% -
PWM 360 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
X300 Pro +30%
2662 nits
X200 Pro
2042 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 161.98 mm (6.38 inches) 162.36 mm (6.39 inches)
Width 75.48 mm (2.97 inches) 75.92 mm (2.99 inches)
Thickness 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) 8.49 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 226 g (7.97 oz) 228 g (8.04 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue, Brown White, Black, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3/5) -
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 180 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
X300 Pro +1%
90.8%
X200 Pro
90.1%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300 Pro and Vivo X200 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 9400
Max clock 4210 MHz 3620 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra		 - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 MediaTek NPU 890
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Immortalis-G925 MC12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300 Pro and Vivo X200 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
X300 Pro +20%
3228
X200 Pro
2686
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
X300 Pro +14%
9553
X200 Pro
8366
Compute Score (GPU)
X300 Pro +28%
27383
X200 Pro
21444
Compute Score (GPU) 27383 21444
Single-core score 3228 2686
Multi-core score 9553 8366
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
X300 Pro +27%
3587829
X200 Pro
2825187
CPU 1046355 900074
GPU 1382122 972096
Memory 388628 345330
UX 770724 607687
Total score 3587829 2825187
Samples [28 tests] [22 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
X300 Pro +28%
3036
X200 Pro
2371
Stability 53% 61%
Graphics test 22 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 3036 2371
3DMark Solar Bay
X300 Pro +29%
13426
X200 Pro
10432
Graphics test 51 FPS 40 FPS
Section 1 57 FPS 44 FPS
Section 2 51 FPS 41 FPS
Section 3 45 FPS 34 FPS
Graphics score 13426 10432
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
X300 Pro
n/a
X200 Pro
6122
Stability - 65%
Graphics test - 36 FPS
Graphics score - 6122
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
X300 Pro +9%
16703
X200 Pro
15327
Web score 14329 13701
Video editing 6016 5803
Photo editing 36698 35653
Data manipulation 14869 13567
Writing score 25904 23556
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (46th and 132nd place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X300 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-27 (Pradip)AnTuTu 123930709
📘 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix)CPU Throttle81%
📘 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix)AnTuTu 124215102
📘 2026-09-03 (chapix)AnTuTu 113935655
📘 2026-08-28 -> Rlamac012AnTuTu 113729488
Add View all (35)
Vivo X200 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate)AnTuTu 123135000
📘 2026-08-01 -> DlackAnTuTu 112847396
📘 2026-08-01 (Dlack)AnTuTu 112847396
📘 2026-07-31 (Xarvis)Geekbench 6 GPU23591
📘 2026-07-31 (Xarvis)Geekbench 6 CPU2432 / 8113
Add View all (34)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM OriginOS 6 Funtouch OS 16
OS size 37 GB -
OS updates 5 years 3 years
Security updates 7 years 3 years

Battery

Capacity 6510 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (30 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (55% in 24 min) Yes (73% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:50 hr 0:46 hr
Battery cycles 1200 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 13:30 hr 12:47 hr
Watching video 15:47 hr 16:41 hr
Gaming 07:14 hr 07:44 hr
Standby 81 hr 85 hr
General battery life
X300 Pro
24:37 hr
X200 Pro +1%
24:55 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 3.7x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119° 119°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.6
Focal length 24 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-828 Sony LYT-818
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/2.7 f/2.7
Focal length 85 mm 85 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPB Samsung ISOCELL HP9
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.56 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
X300 Pro
171
X200 Pro
n/a
Video quality
X300 Pro
169
X200 Pro
n/a
Generic main camera score
X300 Pro
171
X200 Pro
n/a
Bokeh 180 -
Zoom 159 -
Samples Photo samples of Vivo X300 Pro from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 20 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung S5KKD1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/3.42" (≈ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No
Speakers test
Max loudness
X300 Pro
91.8 dB
X200 Pro
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 October 2024
Release date October 2025 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $899 $847
Successor - - Vivo X300 Pro
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 90 W
Further details
Notes on X200 Pro:
    - The black model is thinner (8.2 mm) and lighter (223g).
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo X300 Pro. It has a better camera, performance, gaming, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
257 (59.5%)
175 (40.5%)
Total votes: 432

Related comparisons

1. Vivo X200 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (7)
2. Vivo X200 Pro vs OnePlus 13
3. Vivo X200 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra (1)
4. Vivo X200 Pro vs Vivo X200 Pro mini (3)
5. Vivo X300 Pro vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
6. Vivo X300 Pro vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro
7. Vivo X300 Pro vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (7)
8. Vivo X300 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra (5)
9. Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
10. Vivo X300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Favi12 January 27, 2026 at 01:50 AM
Why do you downgrade vivo camera overall rating when they are far superior to oppo, iPhone 17 pro max, s25 ultra, xiamoi 17 ultra in Camera?
+5 Reply
Avatar
ChinesePhonesGlazer March 6, 2026 at 09:22 AM
Xiaomi 17 Ultra has better camera imo
+1 Reply
Avatar
Favi12 March 28, 2026 at 11:19 AM
ChinesePhonesGlazer, Agree but it still hold it ground and it's the most consistent and have a better video capability than the xiamoi 17 ultra
+1 Reply
EnglishРусский