Vivo X300 Ultra vs Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
93
out of 100
VS
93
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo X300 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on March 30, 2026, against the Oppo Find X10 Pro Max, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro and came out 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Ultra
- The rear camera has a 3.7x optical zoom
- 13% higher pixel density (510 vs 450 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
- Comes with 1400 mAh larger battery capacity: 8000 vs 6600 mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.2)
- 11% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4706K versus 4247K)
- More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
- Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.82 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels | 1272 x 2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.8:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 510 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-144 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 2000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 3600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 288 Hz |
| Screen protection | Armor glass | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 91.4% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | 110 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | β Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.98 mm (6.42 inches) | 161.32 mm (6.35 inches) |
| Width | 76.81 mm (3.02 inches) | 76.57 mm (3.01 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 232 g (8.18 oz) | 233 g (8.22 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Green | White, Gray, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 180 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro |
| Max clock | 4608 MHz | 4550 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 3 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 3 cores at 3.1 GHz: C2-Pro - 3 cores at 4.35 GHz: C2-Pro - 2 cores at 4.55 GHz: C2-Ultra |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 2 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 1090 |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~5529.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27357 | - |
| Single-core score | 3784 | 3943 |
| Multi-core score | 11394 | 12130 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1192014 | 1353582 |
| GPU | 1543938 | 1824959 |
| Memory | 525105 | 478733 |
| UX | 986376 | 1049604 |
| Total score | 4247433 | 4706878 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | Less than 3 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (10th and 5th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X300 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-12 (InphaseCosine18) | AnTuTu 12 | 4098185 |
| π 2026-09-06 (Dipshit6769) | AnTuTu 11 | 3835023 |
| π 2026-08-17 (Razor97FF) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3784 / 11394 |
| π 2026-08-17 (Razor97FF) | AnTuTu 11 | 4175239 |
| π 2026-04-28 (Razor97FF) | AnTuTu 11 | 4247433 |
Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 17 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | ColorOS 17 |
| OS size | 60 GB | - |
| OS updates | 5 years | 5 years |
| Security updates | 7 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6600 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (66% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 0:46 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 10:18 hr | - |
| Watching video | 20:51 hr | - |
| Gaming | 06:43 hr | - |
| Standby | 137 hr | - |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#59th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 200 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12256 | - |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 240FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 480 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 116Β° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 200 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 35 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-901 | Samsung ISOCELL HPC |
| Sensor size | 1/1.12" (β 0.89 inch) | 1/1.3" (β 0.77 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP0 | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (β 0.71 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 0.5 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (β 0.78 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 180 | - |
| Zoom | 172 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Vivo X300 Ultra from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | - |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March 2026 | September 2026 |
| Release date | April 2026 | September 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | $1199 |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | - |
| SAR (body) | 1.29 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the sound is more important to you, then choose the Vivo X300 Ultra. But if the battery life is more of a priority β go for the Oppo Find X10 Pro Max.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1