Vivo X300 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
93
out of 100
VS
93
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo X300 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on March 30, 2026, against the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max, which is powered by Apple A19 Pro and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Ultra
- Delivers 232% higher peak brightness (3309 against 998 nits)
- Comes with 1512 mAh larger battery capacity: 6600 vs 5088 mAh
- 64% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4247K versus 2590K)
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 40W)
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Fingerprint scanner
- 11% higher pixel density (510 vs 460 PPI)
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
- Shows 14% longer battery life (33:14 vs 29:11 hours)
- The rear camera has a 4x optical zoom
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.82 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels | 1320 x 2868 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.8:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 510 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-144 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 3000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Screen protection | Armor glass | Ceramic Shield 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 91.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | 99.9% |
| PWM | 110 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | β Infinity | β Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.98 mm (6.42 inches) | 163.4 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 76.81 mm (3.02 inches) | 78 mm (3.07 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.75 mm (0.34 inches) |
| Weight | 232 g (8.18 oz) | 233 g (8.22 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Green | Silver, Blue, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | No |
| Repairability | Good (3/5) | Good (3.04/5) |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 180 drops | Very good (B) Β· 180 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Apple A19 Pro |
| Max clock | 4608 MHz | 4260 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 6 (2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: - 2 cores at 4.26 GHz: |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Apple Neural Engine |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | 6 core Apple GPU |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~2488.3 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27357 | 46450 |
| Single-core score | 3784 | 3940 |
| Multi-core score | 11394 | 10434 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1192014 | 788283 |
| GPU | 1543938 | 922741 |
| Memory | 525105 | 226010 |
| UX | 986376 | 653533 |
| Total score | 4247433 | 2590567 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [14 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 76% |
| Graphics test | - | 18 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 2487 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 42 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 47 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 42 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 36 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 10999 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#7th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X300 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-06 (Dipshit6769) | AnTuTu | 3835023 |
| π 2026-08-17 (Razor97FF) | GeekBench CPU | 3784 / 11394 |
| π 2026-08-17 (Razor97FF) | AnTuTu | 4175239 |
| π 2026-04-28 (Razor97FF) | AnTuTu | 4247433 |
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-07-31 (xon1005) | GeekBench CPU | 4028 / 10579 |
| π 2026-06-15 (Domi) | AnTuTu | 2427596 |
| π 2026-06-09 (Cristiano) | AnTuTu | 2258714 |
| π 2026-05-29 (Joker) | AnTuTu | 2433128 |
| π 2026-05-16 (Duy Dang) | GeekBench GPU | 46574 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | NVMe |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | iOS 26 (Can be upgraded to iOS 26.5) |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | - |
| OS size | 60 GB | 20 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 7 years |
| Security updates | 7 years | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6600 mAh | 5088 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 40 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | Yes (25 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (66% in 30 min) | Yes (65% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:46 hr | 1:12 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 10:18 hr | 12:36 hr |
| Watching video | 20:51 hr | 22:25 hr |
| Gaming | 06:43 hr | 08:17 hr |
| Standby | 137 hr | 154 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (59th and 22nd place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 48 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12256 | 8064 x 6048 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 4x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 116Β° | 120Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 48 MP 2) Telephoto: 48 MP 3) Ultrawide: 48 MP 4) Depth |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.78 |
| Focal length | 35 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-901 | Sony IMX903 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.12" (β 0.89 inch) | 1/1.28" (β 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 100 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP0 | Sony IMX973 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (β 0.71 inch) | 1/2.55" (β 0.39 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Sony IMX972 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (β 0.78 inch) | 1/2.55" (β 0.39 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 180 | - |
| Zoom | 172 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Vivo X300 Ultra from DxOMark | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | Sony IMX914 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | Yes |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | - |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | eSIM |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March 2026 | September 2025 |
| Release date | April 2026 | September 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | $1199 |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | - |
| SAR (body) | 1.29 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Face recognition sensor |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
Further details
Notes on iPhone 17 Pro Max:
- Battery is 5,088 mAh on the eSIM-only model (vs 4,832 mAh on the Nano SIM + eSIM version).
- The Chinese model alone includes dual Nano SIM slots and 15 W wireless charging.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the display is more important to you, then choose the Vivo X300 Ultra. But if the software and sound are more of a priority β go for the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 663
