Home > Smartphone comparison > X300 Ultra vs X200 Ultra – which one to choose?

Vivo X300 Ultra vs X200 Ultra

93 out of 100
Vivo X300 Ultra
VS
88 out of 100
Vivo X200 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra
Vivo X200 Ultra

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo X300 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on March 30, 2026, against the Vivo X200 Ultra, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments (4)

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Delivers 84% higher peak brightness (3309 against 1800 nits)
  • Shows 20% longer battery life (29:11 vs 24:25 hours)
  • 37% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4247K versus 3092K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • The phone is 11 months newer
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • 27% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3784 and 2979 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300 Ultra and X200 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
39.5
(Mediocre)
Value Index
37.3
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
X300 Ultra
vs
X200 Ultra

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.82 inches 6.82 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3168 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.8:9 19.8:9
PPI 510 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-144 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Screen protection Armor glass Armor glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 90.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% 99.9%
PWM 110 Hz 121 Hz
Response time 1 ms 2 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
X300 Ultra +84%
3309 nits
X200 Ultra
1800 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 162.98 mm (6.42 inches) 163.14 mm (6.42 inches)
Width 76.81 mm (3.02 inches) 76.76 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) 8.69 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 232 g (8.18 oz) 229 g (8.08 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green Black, Silver, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3/5) -
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 180 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
X300 Ultra
90.3%
X200 Ultra
90.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300 Ultra and Vivo X200 Ultra
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4608 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime		 - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300 Ultra and Vivo X200 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
X300 Ultra +27%
3784
X200 Ultra
2979
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
X300 Ultra +22%
11394
X200 Ultra
9353
Compute Score (GPU)
X300 Ultra +11%
27357
X200 Ultra
24604
Compute Score (GPU) 27357 24604
Single-core score 3784 2979
Multi-core score 11394 9353
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
X300 Ultra +37%
4247433
X200 Ultra
3092340
CPU 1192014 819790
GPU 1543938 1185591
Memory 525105 429927
UX 986376 657032
Total score 4247433 3092340
Samples [2 tests] [11 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 50%
Graphics test - 19 FPS
Graphics score - 2561
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 45 FPS
Section 1 - 51 FPS
Section 2 - 46 FPS
Section 3 - 39 FPS
Graphics score - 11897
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 15343
Video editing - 7121
Photo editing - 35679
Data manipulation - 14476
Writing score - 21329
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (7th and 83rd place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X300 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-06 (Dipshit6769)AnTuTu3835023
📘 2026-08-17 (Razor97FF)GeekBench CPU3784 / 11394
📘 2026-08-17 (Razor97FF)AnTuTu4175239
📘 2026-04-28 (Razor97FF)AnTuTu4247433
Add View all (4)
Vivo X200 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-01 (Tt_murco730)AnTuTu3172230
📘 2026-06-07 (L_8888)AnTuTu3074394
📘 2026-06-02 (Obsessed)AnTuTu3179659
📘 2026-05-15 (Хзшник)AnTuTu3172230
📘 2026-03-29 (Tijet)AnTuTu3033519
Add View all (11)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM OriginOS 6 OriginOS 6
OS size 60 GB -
OS updates 5 years -
Security updates 7 years -

Battery

Capacity 6600 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (40 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (66% in 30 min) Yes (64% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:46 hr 0:49 hr
Battery cycles 1200 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:18 hr 12:14 hr
Watching video 20:51 hr 14:52 hr
Gaming 06:43 hr 06:38 hr
Standby 137 hr 95 hr
General battery life
X300 Ultra +20%
29:11 hr
X200 Ultra
24:25 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12256 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 3.7x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 116° 116°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.7
Focal length 35 mm 35 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-901 Sony LYT-818
Sensor size 1/1.12" (≈ 0.89 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/2.7 f/2.3
Focal length 85 mm 85 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP0 Samsung ISOCELL HP9
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.56 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 14 mm 14 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-818 Sony LYT-818
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1.22 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
X300 Ultra +1%
174
X200 Ultra
173
Video quality
X300 Ultra +4%
162
X200 Ultra
156
Generic main camera score
X300 Ultra +2%
170
X200 Ultra
167
Bokeh 180 175
Zoom 172 159
Samples Photo samples of Vivo X300 Ultra from DxOMark Photo samples of Vivo X200 Ultra from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.5
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL JN5 Samsung ISOCELL JN1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
X300 Ultra
84.3 dB
X200 Ultra +4%
87.4 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced March 2026 April 2025
Release date April 2026 April 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $1199 $1099
SAR (head) 0.99 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.29 W/kg -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo X300 Ultra. It has a better gaming, battery life, and connectivity.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
134 (61.8%)
83 (38.2%)
Total votes: 217

Related comparisons

1. Vivo X200 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro (1)
2. Vivo X200 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra (6)
3. Vivo X200 Ultra vs Oppo Find X8 Ultra (4)
4. Vivo X200 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (7)
5. Vivo X200 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (3)
6. Vivo X200 Ultra vs Huawei Pura 80 Ultra
7. Vivo X300 Ultra vs Vivo X300s
8. Vivo X300 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
9. Vivo X300 Ultra vs Oppo Find X9 Pro
10. Vivo X300 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (5)
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Ilhami_3169 April 30, 2026 at 07:22 PM
Design-wise X200 Ultra(red)>X300 Ultra
+1 Reply
Avatar
Polnareff April 10, 2026 at 09:11 AM
I bought the brand new X200 Ultra for only $745 usd (€645), while the X300 Ultra costs $1,230 usd in my place. Just look at that aperture downgrade on the X300U's main camera especially the telephoto's big aperture downgrade, tho the main camera got a slight bigger increase in sensor size. The X200U is still a much better choice if you love 35mm focal length like me and if you get it for around $800usd or below. That telephoto aperture downgrade is definitely a big one, knowing that telephoto cameras need a lower f stop to capture more light especially on the zoomed shots. The X200U is still peak ngl.
+3 Reply
Avatar
Jotaro April 3, 2026 at 12:29 PM
Yo admin, the X300 Ultra has 6,600mah, not 7,000mah. Pls update the battery mah of the X300 Ultra, this is inaccurate.
+1 Reply
Avatar
Serhii April 4, 2026 at 12:45 PM
Appreciate your useful comment.
+1 Reply
EnglishРусский