Vivo X300 vs Honor Win

89 out of 100
Vivo X300
VS
92 out of 100
Honor Win

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X300 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 13, 2025, against the Honor Win, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300
  • Delivers 132% higher peak brightness (2658 against 1147 nits)
  • Weighs 39 grams less
  • Ready for eSIM technology
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Honor Win
  • Comes with 3960 mAh larger battery capacity: 10000 vs 6040 mAh
  • Has a 0.52 inch larger screen size
  • Higher display refresh rate – 185 Hz
  • 20% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3991K versus 3330K)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • 14% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3663 and 3204 points

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300 and Honor Win crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
42.5
(Average)
Value Index
54.0
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.31 inches 6.83 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2640 pixels 1272 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 460 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 185 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 6000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 480 Hz
Screen protection Reinforced Glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 90.2%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% 100%
PWM 360 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Honor Win
6.83β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 17.5 in2
Vivo X300
6.31β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~15% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Vivo X300 +132%
2658 nits
1147 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 150.57 mm (5.93 inches) 163.1 mm (6.42 inches)
Width 71.92 mm (2.83 inches) 76.6 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 7.95 mm (0.31 inches) 8.3 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 190 g (6.7 oz) 229 g (8.08 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Active fan
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Blue, Red, Pink, Purple White, Black, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3/5) -
Drop resistance Very good (B) Β· 180 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
90.3%
90.2%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300 and Honor Win
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 4210 MHz 4610 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300 and Honor Win
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3204
Honor Win +14%
3663
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
9874
Honor Win +11%
10928
Compute Score (GPU)
25501
Honor Win +14%
29142
Compute Score (GPU) 25501 29142
Single-core score 3204 3663
Multi-core score 9874 10928
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3330801
Honor Win +20%
3991174
CPU 981387 1105325
GPU 1256247 1579293
Memory 364630 469071
UX 728537 837485
Total score 3330801 3991174
Samples [25 tests] [17 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo X300 +14%
3119
2741
Stability 57% 70%
Graphics test 23 FPS 20 FPS
Graphics score 3119 2741
3DMark Solar Bay
Vivo X300 +9%
12817
11768
Graphics test 49 FPS 45 FPS
Section 1 56 FPS 53 FPS
Section 2 48 FPS 45 FPS
Section 3 42 FPS 38 FPS
Graphics score 12817 11768
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
15165
Honor Win +32%
19952
Web score 14375 23048
Video editing 5995 9158
Photo editing 34571 40165
Data manipulation 12159 18912
Writing score 22695 25912
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (49th and 18th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (Asura)CPU Throttle70%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Asura)CPU Throttle63%
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (vakiho)AnTuTu3455310
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 -> AsuraAnTuTu3524597
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-12 (burmalda)AnTuTu3363428
Honor Win
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Pyro)AnTuTu3918165
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Ilya)AnTuTu4007911
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-10 (SmileSoul)AnTuTu4260414
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-29 (SmileSoul)AnTuTu4119462
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Ilya)AnTuTu3927863

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM OriginOS 6 MagicOS 10
OS size - 25 GB
OS updates 5 years 7 years
Security updates - 7 years

Battery

Capacity 6040 mAh 10000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (80 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (67% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 27 min)
Full charging time 0:48 hr 1:05 hr
Battery cycles 1200 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:36 hr -
Watching video 20:41 hr -
Gaming 07:52 hr -
Standby 107 hr -
General battery life
28:23 hr
n/a

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12288 8160 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.68 f/2.0
Focal length 23 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPB -
Sensor size 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.4
Focal length 70 mm -
Sensor Sony LYT-602 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/2" (β‰ˆ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 22 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No
Speakers test
Max loudness
Vivo X300 +4%
92.2 dB
88.5 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 December 2025
Release date October 2025 January 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $799 $699
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the battery life and software are more important to you, then choose the Honor Win. But if the connectivity is more of a priority – go for the Vivo X300.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
6 (35.3%)
11 (64.7%)
Total votes: 17

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!