Home > Smartphone comparison > Vivo X300 vs X200 FE โ€“ which one to choose?

Vivo X300 vs X200 FE

88 out of 100
Vivo X300
VS
78 out of 100
Vivo X200 FE
Vivo X300
Vivo X200 FE

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X300 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 13, 2025, against the Vivo X200 FE, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300
  • 56% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3330K versus 2140K)
  • Delivers 51% higher peak brightness (2679 against 1774 nits)
  • Shows 12% longer battery life (28:23 vs 25:14 hours)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 40W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
  • 45% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3204 and 2209 points
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300 and X200 FE crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Vivo X300
85*
X200 FE
76*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Vivo X300
88*
X200 FE
78*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
๐Ÿ“ฑ Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your countryโ€™s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
41.4
(Average)
Value Index
31.7
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Vivo X300
vs
X200 FE

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.31 inches 6.31 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2640 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 460 ppi 461 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Reinforced Glass Schott Xensation Core
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 90.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% 99.8%
PWM 360 Hz 360 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast โˆž Infinity โˆž Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
Vivo X300 +51%
2679 nits
X200 FE
1774 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 150.57 mm (5.93 inches) 150.8 mm (5.94 inches)
Width 71.92 mm (2.83 inches) 71.8 mm (2.83 inches)
Thickness 7.95 mm (0.31 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 190 g (6.7 oz) 186 g (6.56 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Blue, Red, Pink, Purple Black, Blue, Pink, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3/5) Average (2.99/5)
Drop resistance Very good (B) ยท 180 drops Good (C) ยท 100 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X300
90.3%
X200 FE
90.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300 and Vivo X200 FE
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
Max clock 4210 MHz 3400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra		 - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 MediaTek NPU 790
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300 and Vivo X200 FE
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X300 +45%
3204
X200 FE
2209
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X300 +36%
9874
X200 FE
7239
Compute Score (GPU)
Vivo X300 +67%
25501
X200 FE
15299
Compute Score (GPU) 25501 15299
Single-core score 3204 2209
Multi-core score 9874 7239
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X300 +56%
3330801
X200 FE
2140421
CPU 981387 662181
GPU 1256247 664075
Memory 364630 295511
UX 728537 518654
Total score 3330801 2140421
Samples [25 tests] [10 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo X300 +100%
3119
X200 FE
1561
Stability 57% 65%
Graphics test 23 FPS 12 FPS
Graphics score 3119 1561
3DMark Solar Bay
Vivo X300 +90%
12817
X200 FE
6745
Graphics test 49 FPS 26 FPS
Section 1 56 FPS 28 FPS
Section 2 48 FPS 26 FPS
Section 3 42 FPS 22 FPS
Graphics score 12817 6745
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Vivo X300 +9%
15165
X200 FE
13962
Web score 14375 13991
Video editing 5995 5556
Photo editing 34571 26454
Data manipulation 12159 12139
Writing score 22695 21943
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X300
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-20 (Forgolka)AnTuTu 123407758
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Niranjan M)AnTuTu 123402395
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-16 (Asura)CPU Throttle70%
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Asura)CPU Throttle63%
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Asura)AnTuTu 123745245
Add View all (35)
Vivo X200 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Viva plesenัŒ)AnTuTu 112148340
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-31 (Jojorabbit95)AnTuTu 112306009
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-06-14 (ShaSha)AnTuTu 112235448
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Pranav)AnTuTu 112140421
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-17 (Sanjeep halder)AnTuTu 111793939
Add View all (12)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15
ROM OriginOS 6 Funtouch 15
OS size - 57 GB
OS updates 5 years 3 years
Security updates - 4 years

Battery

Capacity 6040 mAh 6500 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (67% in 30 min) Yes (48% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:48 hr 0:58 hr
Battery cycles 1200 cycles 800 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:36 hr 11:34 hr
Watching video 20:41 hr 15:00 hr
Gaming 07:52 hr 07:21 hr
Standby 107 hr 108 hr
General battery life
Vivo X300 +12%
28:23 hr
X200 FE
25:14 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12288 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119ยฐ 119ยฐ
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.68 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPB Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.4" (โ‰ˆ 0.71 inch) 1/1.56" (โ‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.6
Focal length 70 mm 70 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-602 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/1.95" (โ‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (โ‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 OmniVision OV08D10
Sensor size 1/2.76" (โ‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/4.0" (โ‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 20 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung S5KKD1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (โ‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/3.44" (โ‰ˆ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
Vivo X300 +2%
92.2 dB
X200 FE
90.1 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 June 2025
Release date October 2025 July 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $799 $650
Successor - - Vivo X300 FE
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 90 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X300 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
115 (72.8%)
43 (27.2%)
Total votes: 158

Related comparisons

1. Vivo X300 vs Vivo X300 Pro (3)
2. Vivo X300 vs Vivo X200
3. Vivo X300 vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro
4. Vivo X300 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5. Vivo X300 vs Vivo X200 Pro
6. Vivo X200 FE vs OnePlus 13s (2)
7. Vivo X200 FE vs Honor 400 Pro
8. Vivo X200 FE vs Vivo X200s
9. Vivo X200 FE vs Vivo S30 Pro mini (1)
10. Vivo X200 FE vs Realme GT 7 (Global)
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Englishะ ัƒััะบะธะน