Vivo X300 vs Realme GT 7 Pro
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X300 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 13, 2025, against the Realme GT 7 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300
- Handles wireless charging up to 40W
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Delivers 15% higher peak brightness (2670 against 2317 nits)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- The phone is 11 months newer
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- Reverse charging feature
- Weighs 32.8 grams less
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Realme GT 7 Pro
- Shows 13% longer battery life (32:07 vs 28:23 hours)
- Has a 0.47 inch larger screen size
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 90W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.31 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels | 1264 x 2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 2000 nits | 2000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 6500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen protection | Reinforced Glass | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 88.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | 99.8% |
| PWM | 360 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | β Infinity | β Infinity |
Screen space comparison
GT 7 Pro
6.78β³ (20:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
Vivo X300
6.31β³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 150.57 mm (5.93 inches) | 162.5 mm (6.4 inches) |
| Width | 71.92 mm (2.83 inches) | 76.9 mm (3.03 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.95 mm (0.31 inches) | 8.6 mm (0.34 inches) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 222.8 g (7.86 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red, Pink, Purple | White, Gray, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3/5) | Good (3.59/5) |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 180 drops | Good (C) Β· 90 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max clock | 4210 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 990 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1716 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 25501 | 24257 |
| Single-core score | 3204 | 2995 |
| Multi-core score | 9874 | 9380 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 981387 | 893166 |
| GPU | 1256247 | 1098769 |
| Memory | 364630 | 443515 |
| UX | 728537 | 690404 |
| Total score | 3330801 | 3125854 |
| Samples | [25 tests] | [12 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 57% | - |
| Graphics test | 23 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 3119 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 49 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 56 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 48 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 42 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 12817 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14375 | - |
| Video editing | 5995 | - |
| Photo editing | 34571 | - |
| Data manipulation | 12159 | - |
| Writing score | 22695 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (61st and 89th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X300
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-30 -> Forgolka | AnTuTu 12 | 3407758 |
| π 2026-09-20 (Forgolka) | AnTuTu 12 | 3407758 |
| π 2026-09-19 (Niranjan M) | AnTuTu 12 | 3402395 |
| π 2026-09-16 (Asura) | CPU Throttle | 70% |
| π 2026-09-07 (Asura) | CPU Throttle | 63% |
Realme GT 7 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-06-16 (Awiewizz) | AnTuTu 11 | 3125854 |
| π 2026-05-26 (tei0q) | AnTuTu 11 | 3315538 |
| π 2026-05-11 (Neang1201) | AnTuTu 11 | 3360878 |
| π 2026-04-23 (Vladisss) | AnTuTu 11 | 3111924 |
| π 2026-02-02 (Santiijago) | AnTuTu 11 | 3300025 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | Realme UI 6.0 |
| OS size | - | 58 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 3 years |
| Security updates | - | 4 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6040 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 120 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | No |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (67% in 30 min) | Yes (58% in 15 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:48 hr | 0:35 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | 800 cycles |
| Web browsing | 12:36 hr | 16:09 hr |
| Watching video | 20:41 hr | 18:28 hr |
| Gaming | 07:52 hr | 07:48 hr |
| Standby | 107 hr | 132 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (82nd and 27th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12288 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | Up to 24FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119Β° | 112Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.68 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HPB | Sony IMX906 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (β 0.71 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 73 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-602 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/2" (β 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.8" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1.14 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX480 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/3.09" (β 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October 2025 | November 2024 |
| Release date | October 2025 | November 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $800 |
| Successor | - | - Realme GT 8 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 120 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera, gaming, connectivity, software, and design are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X300. But if the battery life is more of a priority β go for the Realme GT 7 Pro.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 27
Related comparisons
5.
Vivo X300 vs Vivo X300 Pro (3)