Vivo X300 vs Realme GT 7 Pro

88 out of 100
Vivo X300
VS
84 out of 100
Realme GT 7 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X300 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 13, 2025, against the Realme GT 7 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300
  • Handles wireless charging up to 40W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Delivers 15% higher peak brightness (2670 against 2317 nits)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • The phone is 11 months newer
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • Reverse charging feature
  • Weighs 32.8 grams less
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Realme GT 7 Pro
  • Shows 13% longer battery life (32:07 vs 28:23 hours)
  • Has a 0.47 inch larger screen size
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 90W)

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300 and Realme GT 7 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
41.4
(Average)
Value Index
80.4
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.31 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2640 pixels 1264 x 2780 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 460 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 6500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Reinforced Glass Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 88.8%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% 99.8%
PWM 360 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
GT 7 Pro
6.78β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
Vivo X300
6.31β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Vivo X300 +15%
2670 nits
2317 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 150.57 mm (5.93 inches) 162.5 mm (6.4 inches)
Width 71.92 mm (2.83 inches) 76.9 mm (3.03 inches)
Thickness 7.95 mm (0.31 inches) 8.6 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 190 g (6.7 oz) 222.8 g (7.86 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Blue, Red, Pink, Purple White, Gray, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3/5) Good (3.59/5)
Drop resistance Very good (B) Β· 180 drops Good (C) Β· 90 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X300 +2%
90.3%
88.8%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300 and Realme GT 7 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4210 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300 and Realme GT 7 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X300 +7%
3204
2995
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X300 +5%
9874
9380
Compute Score (GPU)
Vivo X300 +5%
25501
24257
Compute Score (GPU) 25501 24257
Single-core score 3204 2995
Multi-core score 9874 9380
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X300 +7%
3330801
3125854
CPU 981387 893166
GPU 1256247 1098769
Memory 364630 443515
UX 728537 690404
Total score 3330801 3125854
Samples [25 tests] [12 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
3119
n/a
Stability 57% -
Graphics test 23 FPS -
Graphics score 3119 -
3DMark Solar Bay
12817
n/a
Graphics test 49 FPS -
Section 1 56 FPS -
Section 2 48 FPS -
Section 3 42 FPS -
Graphics score 12817 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
15165
n/a
Web score 14375 -
Video editing 5995 -
Photo editing 34571 -
Data manipulation 12159 -
Writing score 22695 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (61st and 89th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> ForgolkaAnTuTu 123407758
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (Forgolka)AnTuTu 123407758
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Niranjan M)AnTuTu 123402395
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (Asura)CPU Throttle70%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Asura)CPU Throttle63%
Realme GT 7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-16 (Awiewizz)AnTuTu 113125854
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-26 (tei0q)AnTuTu 113315538
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-11 (Neang1201)AnTuTu 113360878
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 (Vladisss)AnTuTu 113111924
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-02 (Santiijago)AnTuTu 113300025

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15
ROM OriginOS 6 Realme UI 6.0
OS size - 58 GB
OS updates 5 years 3 years
Security updates - 4 years

Battery

Capacity 6040 mAh 6500 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) No
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (67% in 30 min) Yes (58% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:48 hr 0:35 hr
Battery cycles 1200 cycles 800 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:36 hr 16:09 hr
Watching video 20:41 hr 18:28 hr
Gaming 07:52 hr 07:48 hr
Standby 107 hr 132 hr
General battery life
28:23 hr
GT 7 Pro +13%
32:07 hr

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16320 x 12288 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 24FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.68 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPB Sony IMX906
Sensor size 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.7
Focal length 70 mm 73 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-602 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/2" (β‰ˆ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Sony IMX355
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.8" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1.14 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 16 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 4608 x 3456
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.5
Focal length 20 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Sony IMX480
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/3.09" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No
Speakers test
Max loudness
Vivo X300 +3%
92.2 dB
89.9 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 November 2024
Release date October 2025 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $799 $800
Successor - - Realme GT 8 Pro
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 120 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, gaming, connectivity, software, and design are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X300. But if the battery life is more of a priority – go for the Realme GT 7 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
21 (77.8%)
6 (22.2%)
Total votes: 27

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!