Vivo X90 Pro vs X100 Pro
69
out of 100
VS
79
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X90 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9200) that was released on November 22, 2022, against the Vivo X100 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9300 and came out 1 year after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X90 Pro
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)
Reasons to consider the Vivo X100 Pro
- The rear camera has a 4.3x optical zoom
- Delivers 57% higher peak brightness (1479 against 943 nits)
- 38% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2450K versus 1781K)
- Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
- Shows 13% longer battery life (22:26 vs 19:53 hours)
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
- The phone is 1 year newer
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 453 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 3000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1300 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 89.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.9% | 99.8% |
| PWM | 60 Hz | 369 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 164.07 mm (6.46 inches) | 164.05 mm (6.46 inches) |
| Width | 74.53 mm (2.93 inches) | 75.28 mm (2.96 inches) |
| Thickness | 9.34 mm (0.37 inches) | 8.91 mm (0.35 inches) |
| Weight | 214.85 g (7.58 oz) | 225 g (7.94 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Red | White, Black, Blue, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 |
| Max clock | 3050 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.05 GHz: Cortex-X3 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 690 | MediaTek NPU 790 |
| Graphics | ARM Immortalis-G715 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| GPU shading units | 1408 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 981 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2762.5 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 14742 |
| Single-core score | 2058 | 2141 |
| Multi-core score | 5465 | 7010 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 574314 | 729780 |
| GPU | 468814 | 860537 |
| Memory | 299490 | 356464 |
| UX | 438622 | 504205 |
| Total score | 1781240 | 2450986 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [7 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 68% |
| Graphics test | 10 FPS | 13 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1351 | 1814 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | - | 64% |
| Graphics test | 21 FPS | 29 FPS |
| Section 1 | 23 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 2 | 22 FPS | 30 FPS |
| Section 3 | 19 FPS | 25 FPS |
| Graphics score | 5571 | 7667 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 80% | 66% |
| Graphics test | 21 FPS | 27 FPS |
| Graphics score | 3565 | 4592 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 11968 |
| Video editing | - | 5599 |
| Photo editing | - | 29205 |
| Data manipulation | - | 12432 |
| Writing score | - | 22989 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#149th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X90 Pro
No benchmark results yet
Vivo X100 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-09 (Mnich) | AnTuTu 12 | 2711576 |
| 📘 2026-08-10 (Mnich.cz) | AnTuTu 11 | 2575927 |
| 📘 2026-08-10 (Mnich) | AnTuTu 11 | 2575927 |
| 📘 2026-06-07 (Kelol6554) | AnTuTu 11 | 2422700 |
| 📘 2026-04-11 (Chin) | AnTuTu 11 | 2252279 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) |
| ROM | Funtouch OS 13 | Funtouch 15 |
| OS size | 35 GB | - |
| OS updates | - | 3 years |
| Security updates | - | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 4870 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 9 min) | Yes (60% in 15 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:24 hr | 0:31 hr |
| Web browsing | 08:13 hr | 09:38 hr |
| Watching video | 12:57 hr | 14:53 hr |
| Gaming | 05:37 hr | 06:25 hr |
| Standby | 87 hr | 94 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50.3 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Optical, 4.3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 24FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 960 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 108° | 119° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50.3 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50.3 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX989 | Sony IMX989 |
| Sensor size | 1/1" (≈ 1 inch) | 1/0.98" (≈ 1.02 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.6 micron | 1.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 50 mm | 100 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX758 | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/2.4" (≈ 0.42 inch) | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX663 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.93" (≈ 0.34 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 70 | 70 |
| Preview | 71 | 81 |
| Zoom | 141 | 155 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Vivo X90 Pro from DxOMark | Photo samples of Vivo X100 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD1 | Samsung S5KGD2 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | - |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | November 2022 | November 2023 |
| Release date | December 2022 | November 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $800 | $800 |
| Successor | - Vivo X300 Pro | - Vivo X300 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Yes, 100 W |
Further details
Notes on X100 Pro:
- The top version (with 16 GB) comes with LPDDR5T memory, while the others feature LPDDR5X.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X100 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 50
