Xiaomi 14 Ultra vs Vivo X100 Pro
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.73-inch Xiaomi 14 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on February 22, 2024, against the Vivo X100 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9300 and came out 4 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 14 Ultra
- The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- 15% higher pixel density (522 vs 452 PPI)
Reasons to consider the Vivo X100 Pro
- Delivers 16% higher peak brightness (1486 against 1283 nits)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.73 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 522 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 3000 nits | 3000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Xiaomi Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 89.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 98.9% | 99.8% |
| PWM | 120 Hz | 369 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 161.4 mm (6.35 inches) | 164.05 mm (6.46 inches) |
| Width | 75.3 mm (2.96 inches) | 75.28 mm (2.96 inches) |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm (0.36 inches) | 8.91 mm (0.35 inches) |
| Weight | 219.8 g (7.75 oz) | 225 g (7.94 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black | White, Black, Blue, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 |
| Max clock | 3300 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 790 |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 903-1000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 16435 | 14742 |
| Single-core score | 2189 | 2141 |
| Multi-core score | 7596 | 7010 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 691662 | 729780 |
| GPU | 815122 | 860537 |
| Memory | 327096 | 356464 |
| UX | 520268 | 504205 |
| Total score | 2354148 | 2450986 |
| Samples | [6 tests] | [7 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 87% | 68% |
| Graphics test | 11 FPS | 13 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1503 | 1814 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | - | 64% |
| Graphics test | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| Section 1 | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 2 | 29 FPS | 30 FPS |
| Section 3 | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| Graphics score | 7556 | 7667 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 83% | 66% |
| Graphics test | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| Graphics score | 4553 | 4592 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14956 | 11968 |
| Video editing | 7926 | 5599 |
| Photo editing | 32564 | 29205 |
| Data manipulation | 15766 | 12432 |
| Writing score | 19505 | 22989 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (171st and 140th place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-06-15 (Truffel) | AnTuTu | 2354148 |
| 📘 2026-04-03 (Diebetz) | GeekBench CPU | 2189 / 7596 |
| 📘 2026-02-18 (Putter) | AnTuTu | 2345207 |
| 📘 2026-02-17 (Pavlysha) | AnTuTu | 2274789 |
| 📘 2025-11-06 (s1) | AnTuTu | 2368016 |
Vivo X100 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-10 (Mnich.cz) | AnTuTu | 2575927 |
| 📘 2026-08-10 (Mnich) | AnTuTu | 2575927 |
| 📘 2026-06-07 (Kelol6554) | AnTuTu | 2422700 |
| 📘 2026-04-11 (Chin) | AnTuTu | 2252279 |
| 📘 2025-12-21 (Alpha) | AnTuTu | 2260515 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | Funtouch 15 |
| OS size | 31 GB | - |
| OS updates | 4 years | 3 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (80 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (52% in 15 min) | Yes (60% in 15 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:34 hr | 0:31 hr |
| Web browsing | 09:23 hr | 09:38 hr |
| Watching video | 12:26 hr | 14:53 hr |
| Gaming | 04:35 hr | 06:25 hr |
| Standby | 109 hr | 94 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Optical, 4.3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 1920 FPS (1080p) | 960 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 122° | 119° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Telephoto: 50 MP 4) Ultrawide: 50 MP 5) Depth |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 - 4.0 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-900 | Sony IMX989 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.0" (≈ 1 inch) | 1/0.98" (≈ 1.02 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.6 micron | 1.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 120 mm | 100 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX858 | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch) | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 12 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX858 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 75 | 70 |
| Preview | 83 | 81 |
| Zoom | 160 | 155 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Xiaomi 14 Ultra from DxOMark | Photo samples of Vivo X100 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32B | Samsung S5KGD2 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch) | 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes, DP 1.2 | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | - |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | February 2024 | November 2023 |
| Release date | February 2024 | November 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | $800 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi 17 Ultra | - Vivo X300 Pro |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 100 W |
Further details
Notes on 14 Ultra:
- The rear cover is available in glass or eco-leather, while the frame can be aluminum or titanium.
- The front glass is either Xiaomi Shield Glass or Xiaomi Longjing Glass.
Notes on X100 Pro:
- The top version (with 16 GB) comes with LPDDR5T memory, while the others feature LPDDR5X.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi 14 Ultra. It has a better display and software.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 468