Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Xiaomi 17 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on December 25, 2025, against the Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9030S and came out 7 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • 2.3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3667K versus 1622K)
  • Delivers 106% higher peak brightness (3687 against 1786 nits)
  • Shows 45% longer battery life (33:23 vs 23:04 hours)
  • The rear camera has a 4.3x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • 2.9x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3711 and 1269 points
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 11% higher pixel density (460 vs 416 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • The phone is 7 months newer

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 17 Ultra and Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 512 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
29.9
(Mediocre)
Value Index
28.3
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.9 inches
Resolution 1200 x 2608 pixels 1308 x 2880 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 -
PPI 416 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1200 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits -
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz -
Screen protection Xiaomi Shield Glass 3.0 Kunlun Glass 2
Screen-to-body ratio 92.4% 90.7%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% -
PWM 121 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
17 Ultra +106%
3687 nits
1786 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 162.9 mm (6.41 inches) 164 mm (6.46 inches)
Width 77.6 mm (3.06 inches) 77.1 mm (3.04 inches)
Thickness 8.29 mm (0.33 inches) 8.1 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 218.4 g (7.7 oz) 230.5 g (8.13 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material - Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Green, Purple Black, Gold, Orange, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-button
Repairability Average (2.63/5) -
Drop resistance Excellent (A) · 270 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
17 Ultra +2%
92.4%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 17 Ultra and Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 HiSilicon Kirin 9030S
Max clock 4610 MHz 2700 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 4 cores at 1.62 GHz: Taishan v124 Little
- 3 cores at 2.15 GHz: Taishan v124 Mid
- 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Taishan v124 Big
L3 cache 12 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 5 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Da Vinci
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Maleoon 935F
GPU shading units 1536 768
GPU clock 1300 MHz 933 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~1433.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 17 Ultra and Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
17 Ultra +192%
3711
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
17 Ultra +154%
11259
Compute Score (GPU)
17 Ultra +507%
27219
Compute Score (GPU) 27219 4481
Single-core score 3711 1269
Multi-core score 11259 4424
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
17 Ultra +126%
3667711
CPU 1064371 601782
GPU 1296835 300105
Memory 518366 374029
UX 788139 346833
Total score 3667711 1622749
Samples [7 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 81% -
Graphics test 18 FPS -
Graphics score 2370 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 41 FPS -
Section 1 46 FPS -
Section 2 41 FPS -
Section 3 36 FPS -
Graphics score 10845 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 16855 -
Video editing 8052 -
Photo editing 40273 -
Data manipulation 15949 -
Writing score 26073 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-13 (H1roshi)AnTuTu3530859
📘 2026-07-04 (...)AnTuTu3582442
📘 2026-06-26 (ALBAY)AnTuTu3913603
📘 2026-04-18 (UsusWarteg)AnTuTu3828672
📘 2026-03-17 (KosmosTer)AnTuTu3527804
Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
No benchmark results yet

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 512 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 EMUI 16
OS size 36 GB -
OS updates 6 years -
Security updates 6 years -

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (80 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (72% in 30 min) Yes (60% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:50 hr 1:02 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 16:09 hr 09:34 hr
Watching video 22:41 hr 17:56 hr
Gaming 08:02 hr 05:39 hr
Standby 125 hr 88 hr
General battery life
17 Ultra +45%
33:23 hr
23:04 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 4.3x Optical, 4x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 115° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 40 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.67 f/1.4 - 4.0
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor OmniVision OVX10500 -
Sensor size 1/1" (≈ 1 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1.6 micron -
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/2.4 - 3.0 f/2.6
Focal length 100 mm 89 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPE -
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 40 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 14 mm 13 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Omnivision OV40A
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/1.7" (≈ 0.59 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 1 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 175 -
Zoom 169 -
Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi 17 Ultra from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 4160 x 3120
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm -
Sensor Omnivision OV50M CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) -
Pixel size 0.61 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.1
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced December 2025 July 2026
Release date March 2026 August 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $1199 $1149
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
8 (53.3%)
7 (46.7%)
Total votes: 15

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!