Home > Smartphone comparison > Xiaomi 17 vs Vivo X200T – which one to choose?

Xiaomi 17 vs Vivo X200T

91 out of 100
Xiaomi 17
VS
84 out of 100
Vivo X200T
Xiaomi 17
Vivo X200T

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.3-inch Xiaomi 17 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Vivo X200T, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus and came out 4 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • 25% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3404K versus 2725K)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • 31% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3583 and 2729 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200T
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Has a 0.37 inch larger screen size

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi 17 and Vivo X200T crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
36.5
(Mediocre)
Value Index
71.4
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Xiaomi 17
vs
Vivo X200T

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.3 inches 6.67 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2656 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 464 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 1200 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz -
Screen protection Xiaomi Shield Glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 89.9% 90.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 102.9% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Vivo X200T
6.67β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 16.6 in2
Xiaomi 17
6.3β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~10% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Xiaomi 17
3448 nits
Vivo X200T
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 151.1 mm (5.95 inches) 160.01 mm (6.3 inches)
Width 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) 74.29 mm (2.92 inches)
Thickness 8.06 mm (0.32 inches) 7.99 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 191 g (6.74 oz) 205 g (7.23 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue, Green, Pink, Purple Black, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.63/5) -
Drop resistance Excellent (A) Β· 270 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi 17
89.9%
Vivo X200T
90.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi 17 and Vivo X200T
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
Max clock 4610 MHz 3730 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime		 - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925
L3 cache 12 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 890
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi 17 and Vivo X200T
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi 17 +31%
3583
Vivo X200T
2729
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi 17 +28%
10772
Vivo X200T
8430
Compute Score (GPU)
Xiaomi 17 +28%
27737
Vivo X200T
21754
Compute Score (GPU) 27737 21754
Single-core score 3583 2729
Multi-core score 10772 8430
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Xiaomi 17 +25%
3404616
Vivo X200T
2725989
CPU 961758 800906
GPU 1232901 988549
Memory 517802 371345
UX 692155 565189
Total score 3404616 2725989
Samples [9 tests] [6 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 78% -
Graphics test 17 FPS -
Graphics score 2354 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Xiaomi 17
10821
Vivo X200T
n/a
Graphics test 41 FPS -
Section 1 46 FPS -
Section 2 41 FPS -
Section 3 36 FPS -
Graphics score 10821 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 35 FPS -
Graphics score 5976 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Xiaomi 17
18794
Vivo X200T
n/a
Web score 17608 -
Video editing 8079 -
Photo editing 37146 -
Data manipulation 15067 -
Writing score 25125 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (54th and 137th place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi 17
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (HoΓ ng HαΊ£i)AnTuTu 123638992
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Nikko)AnTuTu 113512813
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-18 (Ivan)AnTuTu 113632260
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 (Wallt)AnTuTu 113277818
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 (Missed)AnTuTu 113722570
Add View all (11)
Vivo X200T
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (Anand)AnTuTu 122939313
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (GTALVG)AnTuTu 112594807
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-05 (Sachin)AnTuTu 112688395
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-19 (Sagark)AnTuTu 112472407
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-14 (adi)Geekbench 6 CPU2729 / 8430
Add View all (8)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 OriginOS 6
OS size 35 GB -
OS updates 6 years 5 years
Security updates 6 years -

Battery

Capacity 6330 mAh 6200 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (40 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (71% in 30 min) Yes (70% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:46 hr 0:54 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 15:00 hr -
Watching video 24:44 hr -
Gaming 08:15 hr -
Standby 131 hr -
General battery life
Xiaomi 17
33:58 hr
Vivo X200T
n/a
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2.6x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 102Β° 119Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Omnivision 950L LightHunter Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.31" (β‰ˆ 0.76 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1.2 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.6
Focal length 60 mm 70 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.0
Focal length 17 mm 15 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50M Samsung JD1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/3.14" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm 20 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50M Samsung KD1
Sensor size 1/2.88" (β‰ˆ 0.35 inch) 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes -
Speakers test
Max loudness
Xiaomi 17
86.2 dB
Vivo X200T
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced September 2025 January 2026
Release date September 2025 February 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $999 $650
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 90 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi 17. It has a better camera, performance, gaming, battery life, connectivity, software, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Related comparisons

1. Xiaomi 17 vs Apple iPhone 17 (1)
2. Xiaomi 17 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 (1)
3. Xiaomi 17 vs Xiaomi 15
4. Xiaomi 17 vs Realme GT 7 (Global) (1)
5. Xiaomi 17 vs Nothing Phone (3)
6. Vivo X200T vs Vivo X300
7. Vivo X200T vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
8. Vivo X200T vs OnePlus 15R
9. Vivo X200T vs Vivo X200 FE
10. Vivo X200T vs Vivo iQOO 15
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский