Vivo X200T vs X200 FE

85 out of 100
Vivo X200T
VS
78 out of 100
Vivo X200 FE

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.67-inch Vivo X200T (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus) that was released on January 27, 2026, against the Vivo X200 FE, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200T
  • Handles wireless charging up to 40W
  • Has a 0.36 inch larger screen size
  • 27% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2725K versus 2140K)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
  • The phone is 7 months newer
  • 24% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2729 and 2209 points
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Weighs 19 grams less
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200T and X200 FE crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
73.3
(Good)
Value Index
31.7
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.31 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 460 ppi 461 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5000 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate - 300 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Schott Xensation Core
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 90.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.8%
PWM - 360 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Vivo X200T
6.67″ (20:9 ratio) = 16.6 in2
X200 FE
6.31″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~9% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1766 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 160.01 mm (6.3 inches) 150.8 mm (5.94 inches)
Width 74.29 mm (2.92 inches) 71.8 mm (2.83 inches)
Thickness 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 205 g (7.23 oz) 186 g (6.56 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Purple Black, Blue, Pink, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Average (2.99/5)
Drop resistance - Good (C) · 100 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
90.3%
90.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200T and Vivo X200 FE
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
Max clock 3730 MHz 3400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 MediaTek NPU 790
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1612 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200T and Vivo X200 FE
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200T +24%
2729
2209
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200T +16%
8430
7239
Compute Score (GPU)
Vivo X200T +42%
21754
15299
Compute Score (GPU) 21754 15299
Single-core score 2729 2209
Multi-core score 8430 7239
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X200T +27%
2725989
2140421
CPU 800906 662181
GPU 988549 664075
Memory 371345 295511
UX 565189 518654
Total score 2725989 2140421
Samples [6 tests] [10 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1561
Stability - 65%
Graphics test - 12 FPS
Graphics score - 1561
3DMark Solar Bay
6745
Graphics test - 26 FPS
Section 1 - 28 FPS
Section 2 - 26 FPS
Section 3 - 22 FPS
Graphics score - 6745
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
13962
Web score - 13991
Video editing - 5556
Photo editing - 26454
Data manipulation - 12139
Writing score - 21943
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#124th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200T
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-24 (GTALVG)AnTuTu2594807
📘 2026-07-05 (Sachin)AnTuTu2688395
📘 2026-05-19 (Sagark)AnTuTu2472407
📘 2026-05-14 (adi)GeekBench CPU2729 / 8430
📘 2026-05-14 (adi)AnTuTu2908444
Vivo X200 FE
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-11 (Viva plesenь)AnTuTu2148340
📘 2026-08-31 (Jojorabbit95)AnTuTu2306009
📘 2026-06-14 (ShaSha)AnTuTu2235448
📘 2026-06-04 (Pranav)AnTuTu2140421
📘 2026-05-17 (Sanjeep halder)AnTuTu1793939

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15
ROM OriginOS 6 Funtouch 15
OS size - 57 GB
OS updates 5 years 3 years
Security updates - 4 years

Battery

Capacity 6200 mAh 6500 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (70% in 30 min) Yes (48% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:54 hr 0:58 hr
Battery cycles - 800 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 11:34 hr
Watching video - 15:00 hr
Gaming - 07:21 hr
Standby - 108 hr
General battery life
25:14 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119° 119°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony IMX921 Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.6
Focal length 70 mm 70 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor Samsung JD1 OmniVision OV08D10
Sensor size 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 20 mm
Sensor Samsung KD1 Samsung S5KKD1
Sensor size 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.1 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced January 2026 June 2025
Release date February 2026 July 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $650 $650
Successor - - Vivo X300 FE
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 90 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X200T is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
11 (91.7%)
1 (8.3%)
Total votes: 12

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!