Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra vs Vivo X200T

90 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
VS
84 out of 100
Vivo X200T

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.9-inch Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on November 26, 2025, against the Vivo X200T, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
  • 42% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3862K versus 2725K)
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • 32% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3604 and 2729 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200T
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 11% higher pixel density (460 vs 416 PPI)

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra and Vivo X200T crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
47.3
(Average)
Value Index
71.4
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.9 inches 6.67 inches
Resolution 1200 x 2608 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 416 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz -
Screen protection Poco Shield Glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 91.9% 90.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.6% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Poco F8 Ultra
6.9β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 18.1 in2
Vivo X200T
6.67β€³ (20:9 ratio) = 16.6 in2
~8% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
3503 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.33 mm (6.43 inches) 160.01 mm (6.3 inches)
Width 77.82 mm (3.06 inches) 74.29 mm (2.92 inches)
Thickness 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) 7.99 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 218 g (7.69 oz) 205 g (7.23 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material - Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue Black, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.63/5) -
Drop resistance Excellent (A) Β· 270 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
91.9%
90.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra and Vivo X200T
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
Max clock 4600 MHz 3730 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925
L3 cache 12 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 890
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra and Vivo X200T
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3604
2729
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
10752
8430
Compute Score (GPU)
27501
21754
Compute Score (GPU) 27501 21754
Single-core score 3604 2729
Multi-core score 10752 8430
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3862914
2725989
CPU 1113289 800906
GPU 1452771 988549
Memory 507250 371345
UX 789604 565189
Total score 3862914 2725989
Samples [36 tests] [6 tests]
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (37th and 137th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Johnnis)AnTuTu 123903835
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Π›Π°ΠΏΠΊΠ°)AnTuTu 123944588
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 -> ChubzueyAnTuTu 124214043
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 -> ChubzueyAnTuTu 124143093
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (Bestiqooguyidk)AnTuTu 113812038
Vivo X200T
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (Anand)AnTuTu 122939313
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (GTALVG)AnTuTu 112594807
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-05 (Sachin)AnTuTu 112688395
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-19 (Sagark)AnTuTu 112472407
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-14 (adi)Geekbench 6 CPU2729 / 8430

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 OriginOS 6
OS size 36 GB -
OS updates 4 years 5 years
Security updates 6 years -

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 6200 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) Yes (40 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (78% in 15 min) Yes (70% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:39 hr 0:54 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 15:14 hr -
Watching video 22:44 hr -
Gaming 08:06 hr -
Standby 124 hr -
General battery life
32:38 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 5x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 102Β° 119Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.6
Focal length 23 mm 23 mm
Sensor Omnivision Light Hunter 950 Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.31" (β‰ˆ 0.76 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1.2 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/3.0 f/2.6
Focal length 115 mm 70 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.0
Focal length 18 mm 15 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50M40 Samsung JD1
Sensor size 1/2.88" (β‰ˆ 0.35 inch) 1/3.14" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution - 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm 20 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV32D Samsung KD1
Sensor size 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.1 Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes -
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced November 2025 January 2026
Release date November 2025 February 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $729 $650
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 90 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra. It has a better camera, performance, gaming, battery life, connectivity, software, design, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!