Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Samsung Galaxy A52

53 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F3
VS
46 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy A52

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco F3 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G) that was released on March 22, 2021, against the Samsung Galaxy A52, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F3
  • 2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1014K versus 508K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.1)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 2750 MHz
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • Has 50% more RAM: 6GB versus 4GB
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.1
  • 52% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1125 and 738 points
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A52
  • Shows 12% longer battery life (22:27 vs 19:59 hours)
  • Optical image stabilization
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
  • Waterproof body (IP67 classification)
  • Delivers 11% higher peak brightness (798 against 722 nits)
  • More recent OS version: Android 14 versus 13
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F3 and Samsung Galaxy A52 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
6 / 128 GB
VS
4 / 64 GB
43.0
(Average)
Value Index
91.0
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED Super AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.5 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 395 ppi 407 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max rated brightness 700 nits 800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1300 nits -
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Screen-to-body ratio 85.9% 85%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% 99.3%
PWM 490 Hz 183 Hz
Response time 3 ms 4.4 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
722 nits
Galaxy A52 +11%
798 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 163.7 mm (6.44 inches) 159.9 mm (6.3 inches)
Width 76.4 mm (3.01 inches) 75.1 mm (2.96 inches)
Thickness 7.8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.4 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 196 g (6.91 oz) 189 g (6.67 oz)
Waterproof IP53 IP67
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors White, Black, Blue White, Black, Blue, Pink
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
Poco F3 +1%
85.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F3 and Samsung Galaxy A52
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
Max clock 3200 MHz 2300 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)
- 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)
- 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55)
- 2 cores at 2.3 GHz: Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76)
L3 cache 4 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 7 nanometers 8 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 698 Hexagon 692
GPU
Graphics Adreno 650 Adreno 618
GPU shading units 768 256
GPU clock 670 MHz 750 MHz
FLOPS ~1029.1 GFLOPS ~384 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F3 and Samsung Galaxy A52
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Poco F3 +52%
1125
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Poco F3 +84%
3176
1724
Compute Score (GPU)
Poco F3 +178%
3392
1221
Compute Score (GPU) 3392 1221
Single-core score 1125 738
Multi-core score 3176 1724
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Poco F3 +100%
1014957
508360
CPU 390209 202719
GPU 183875 48709
Memory 166763 88581
UX 274110 168351
Total score 1014957 508360
Samples [35 tests] [12 tests]
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Poco F3 +288%
1213
Stability 90% 98%
Graphics test 7 FPS 1 FPS
Graphics score 1213 313
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Poco F3 +23%
11262
9187
Web score 8717 8030
Video editing 6160 6295
Photo editing 28589 18039
Data manipulation 8731 7577
Writing score 14382 9464

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (Π―Π½)AnTuTu983640
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 (DAP)AnTuTu986264
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-01 (Gats)AnTuTu1045854
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-25 (Π―Π½)GeekBench CPU1081 / 2905
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-25 (Π―Π½)AnTuTu978310
Samsung Galaxy A52
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-23 (Itsorif)AnTuTu501313
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-07 (Itsorif)AnTuTu497969
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-05 (Dovinge)AnTuTu509471
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-31 (Rozr)AnTuTu492323
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-24 (Rikosol)AnTuTu470138

Memory

RAM
RAM size 6 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 64 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1
Memory card No MicroSD
Memory card max size - Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 14)
ROM HyperOS 1.0 One UI 6.1
OS size 21 GB 25.8 GB
OS updates - 2 years
Security updates - 4 years

Battery

Capacity 4520 mAh 4500 mAh
Max charge power 33 W 25 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (67% in 30 min) Yes (35% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:56 hr 1:30 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:42 hr 08:10 hr
Watching video 12:58 hr 12:28 hr
Gaming 05:31 hr 04:57 hr
Standby 85 hr 122 hr
General battery life
19:59 hr
Galaxy A52 +12%
22:27 hr

Main camera

Matrix 48 megapixels 64 megapixels
Image resolution 8000 x 6000 9000 x 7000
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 123Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 5 MP
1) Standard: 64 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
3) Macro: 5 MP
4) Depth: 5 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 48 MP 64 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm 26 mm
Sensor Sony IMX582 Sony IMX682
Sensor size 1/2.0" (β‰ˆ 0.5 inch) 1/1.7" (β‰ˆ 0.59 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 13 mm
Sensor Sony IMX355 -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 5 MP 5 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.4
Focal length 50 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5K5E8 -
Sensor size 1/5.0" (β‰ˆ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.75 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.2
Focal length 26 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung S5K3T2 Sony IMX616
Sensor size 1/3.4" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/2.8" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.1 5
Bluetooth features LE, HID, A2DP PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No Yes
LTE Cat* 20 15
5G support Yes No

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No Yes
FM radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
Poco F3 +1%
89.4 dB
88.8 dB

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced March 2021 March 2021
Release date March 2021 March 2021
Launch price (MSRP) $350 $350
Successor - Xiaomi Poco F7 -
SAR (head) - 0.35 W/kg
SAR (body) - 0.84 W/kg
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco F3 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
985 (81.8%)
219 (18.2%)
Total votes: 1204

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!