Xiaomi Poco F7 vs Honor 400

76 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F7
VS
69 out of 100
Honor 400

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Poco F7 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on June 24, 2025, against the Honor 400, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7
  • 2.1x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2263K versus 1087K)
  • Shows 12% longer battery life (26:05 vs 23:16 hours)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 80% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2040 and 1136 points
Reasons to consider the Honor 400
  • Weighs 31.7 grams less
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F7 and Honor 400 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
68*
80*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
76*
69*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
75.0
(Good)
Value Index
53.2
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.83 inches 6.55 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2772 pixels 1264 x 2736 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 447 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 1700 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1% 90.2%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% -
PWM 240 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Screen space comparison
Poco F7
6.83β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.7 in2
Honor 400
6.55β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 16.3 in2
~8% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
1525 nits
Honor 400 +1%
1540 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.1 mm (6.42 inches) 156.5 mm (6.16 inches)
Width 77.9 mm (3.07 inches) 74.6 mm (2.94 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 7.3 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 215.7 g (7.61 oz) 184 g (6.49 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP66
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors White, Black, Silver Black, Silver, Gold, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.61/5) Good (3.63/5)
Drop resistance Average (D) Β· 45 drops Very good (B) Β· 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
90.1%
90.2%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F7 and Honor 400
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Max clock 3210 MHz 2630 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)
- 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)
L3 cache 8 MB 3 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 825 Adreno 720
GPU shading units 1024 512
GPU clock 1150 MHz 975 MHz
FLOPS ~2355.2 GFLOPS ~998.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F7 and Honor 400
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Poco F7 +80%
2040
1136
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Poco F7 +105%
6373
3107
Compute Score (GPU)
Poco F7 +236%
13641
4060
Compute Score (GPU) 13641 4060
Single-core score 2040 1136
Multi-core score 6373 3107
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Poco F7 +108%
2263357
1087525
CPU 632157 403084
GPU 793892 207834
Memory 365292 216538
UX 472016 260069
Total score 2263357 1087525
Samples [170 tests] [32 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1688
n/a
Stability 83% -
Graphics test 13 FPS -
Graphics score 1688 -
3DMark Solar Bay
7708
n/a
Graphics test 29 FPS -
Section 1 33 FPS -
Section 2 30 FPS -
Section 3 25 FPS -
Graphics score 7708 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
15335
n/a
Web score 15597 -
Video editing 7750 -
Photo editing 26988 -
Data manipulation 13734 -
Writing score 17764 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F7
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (ASHOK)AnTuTu 122346502
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Luis)AnTuTu 122422061
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (Thai)AnTuTu 122603535
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Thai)AnTuTu 122562298
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (Deff)AnTuTu 122452982
Honor 400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (Baclaven)AnTuTu 11947758
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (Iulitic211Rg)AnTuTu 111102591
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (TheOdin)AnTuTu 111098513
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-08 (brozzlex)AnTuTu 111089031
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-02 (ElijaHaH)Geekbench 6 GPU3475

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory clock 4800 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3.0 MagicOS 10
OS size 44 GB -
OS updates 4 years 6 years
Security updates 6 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 6000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (90% in 30 min) Yes (80% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:39 hr 0:41 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles 1200 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:24 hr 09:20 hr
Watching video 14:33 hr 12:17 hr
Gaming 07:05 hr 05:43 hr
Standby 130 hr 121 hr
General battery life
Poco F7 +12%
26:05 hr
23:16 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 16384 x 12288
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) -
Angle of widest lens 120Β° 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.9
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX882 Samsung ISOCELL HP3
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.56 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor Omnivision OV08F -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm -
Sensor Omnivision OV20B CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
89.5 dB
n/a

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced June 2025 May 2025
Release date June 2025 May 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $399 $499
Successor - - Honor 500
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 100 W
Further details
Notes on Poco F7:
    - The Indian model has a larger battery β€” 7550 mAh.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco F7 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
163 (80.7%)
39 (19.3%)
Total votes: 202

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!