Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro vs Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra) that was released on January 9, 2025, against the Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global), which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and came out 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
Reasons to consider the Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 90W)
  • 24% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2391K versus 1930K)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • 37% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2151 and 1573 points
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
107.5
(Excellent)
Value Index
139.0
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2712 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 446 ppi 452 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-144 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1400 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 5500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Shield Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 88.8% 89.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.6% -
PWM 120 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 160.75 mm (6.33 inches) 163.72 mm (6.45 inches)
Width 75.24 mm (2.96 inches) 75.88 mm (2.99 inches)
Thickness 8.29 mm (0.33 inches) 8.09 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 195 g (6.88 oz) 206 g (7.27 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP65
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Plastic
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors Black, Green, Yellow Gray, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Max clock 3250 MHz 3210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 MC7 Adreno 825
GPU shading units 896 1024
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS ~2355.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 12162 18518
Single-core score 1573 2151
Multi-core score 6102 6825
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1930851
2391014
CPU 621813 674929
GPU 602568 801298
Memory 295421 381888
UX 411049 532899
Total score 1930851 2391014
Samples [212 tests] [99 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 80% 76%
Graphics test 10 FPS 8 FPS
Graphics score 1285 1073
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 23 FPS 19 FPS
Section 1 24 FPS 21 FPS
Section 2 23 FPS 19 FPS
Section 3 20 FPS 16 FPS
Graphics score 5931 4971
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14924 10240
Video editing 6707 6021
Photo editing 23231 25601
Data manipulation 12242 10644
Writing score 18327 13811
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#171st place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 -> Mohammad.SodaeiAnTuTu 122257137
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Abdul)AnTuTu 122149140
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Kkk)AnTuTu 122149090
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Xann)AnTuTu 122143962
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (AYS)AnTuTu 122192420
Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (heytempl)AnTuTu 112391065
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (SEMTEX)AnTuTu 112483733
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (diesel)AnTuTu 112360168
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (D1saver)AnTuTu 112328560
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-20 (z2z3x5)AnTuTu 112299804

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4200 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3.0 OriginOS 6
OS updates 3 years -
Security updates 4 years -

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 17 min) Yes
Full charging time 0:42 hr -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:29 hr -
Watching video 15:22 hr -
Gaming 05:54 hr -
Standby 93 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX882 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor Smartsens SC820CS -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 -
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.5
Focal length 21 mm -
Sensor Omnivision OV20B Sony IMX480
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/3.09" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced January 2025 May 2025
Release date January 2025 June 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $299 $399
Successor - Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max -
SAR (head) 0.99 W/kg -
SAR (body) 0.99 W/kg -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 120 W
Further details
Notes on Poco X7 Pro:
    - The eco-leather version is thicker at 8.43 mm and weighs 198 grams.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global). But if the software and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
110 (16.7%)
547 (83.3%)
Total votes: 657

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!