Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro vs Honor 600

86 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
VS
77 out of 100
Honor 600

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.59-inch Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on November 26, 2025, against the Honor 600, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and came out 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
  • 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3124K versus 1426K)
  • The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
  • 2.3x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3013 and 1329 points
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Honor 600
  • Delivers 77% higher peak brightness (6219 against 3504 nits)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Comes with 790 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6210 mAh
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro and Honor 600 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
87.5
(Very good)
Value Index
59.2
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.59 inches 6.57 inches
Resolution 1156 x 2510 pixels 1264 x 2728 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 419 ppi 458 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 8000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90% 90.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% 99.8%
PWM 120 Hz 60 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
3504 nits
Honor 600 +77%
6219 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 157.5 mm (6.2 inches) 156 mm (6.14 inches)
Width 75.2 mm (2.96 inches) 74.7 mm (2.94 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 7.8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 199 g (7.02 oz) 185 g (6.53 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Blue White, Black, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.63/5) -
Drop resistance Very good (B) Β· 180 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
Honor 600 +1%
90.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro and Honor 600
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Max clock 4470 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 3 cores at 1.84 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-520)
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-720)
- 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-720)
L3 cache 8 MB 3 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Adreno 722
GPU shading units 1536 512
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~1177.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro and Honor 600
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Poco F8 Pro +127%
3013
1329
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Poco F8 Pro +126%
9287
4105
Compute Score (GPU)
Poco F8 Pro +147%
18324
7418
Compute Score (GPU) 18324 7418
Single-core score 3013 1329
Multi-core score 9287 4105
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Poco F8 Pro +119%
3124552
1426281
CPU 947041 473212
GPU 1160694 321485
Memory 387566 295825
UX 629251 335759
Total score 3124552 1426281
Samples [32 tests] [2 tests]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-07 -> Jayjellyjafetjessy_88AnTuTu3084676
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Takehashi)AnTuTu3167640
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-22 (Chilliadx)AnTuTu3043142
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-12 (Filbert)AnTuTu3050130
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 (Egor4ik)AnTuTu3095115
Honor 600
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-13 (ПавСл)AnTuTu1324118
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 (Mohamed)AnTuTu1426281

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 3200 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 MagicOS 10
OS updates 5 years 6 years
Security updates - 6 years

Battery

Capacity 6210 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 80 W
Battery type Li-Po Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (80% in 30 min) Yes (71% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:39 hr 0:47 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:55 hr 13:28 hr
Watching video 21:09 hr 22:06 hr
Gaming 07:36 hr 07:11 hr
Standby 122 hr 135 hr
General battery life
30:03 hr
Honor 600 +6%
31:54 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 16384 x 12288
Zoom Optical, 2.5x Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120Β° 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.9
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800 Samsung ISOCELL HP9
Sensor size 1/1.55" (β‰ˆ 0.65 inch) 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.56 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP -
Aperture f/2.2 -
Focal length 60 mm -
Sensor Omnivision OV50M -
Sensor size 1/2.88" (β‰ˆ 0.35 inch) -
Pixel size 0.612 micron -
Stabilization Digital -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV08F -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution - 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 21 mm 21 mm
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2" (β‰ˆ 0.5 inch) 1/2.88" (β‰ˆ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.61 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version - 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Depends on the region
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
93 dB
87.8 dB

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced November 2025 April 2026
Release date November 2025 April 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $579 $649
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
23 (79.3%)
6 (20.7%)
Total votes: 29

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!