Home > Smartphone comparison > Vivo X200T vs Honor 600 – which one to choose?

Vivo X200T vs Honor 600

85 out of 100
Vivo X200T
VS
77 out of 100
Honor 600
Vivo X200T
Honor 600

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Vivo X200T (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus) that was released on January 27, 2026, against the Honor 600, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200T
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • 91% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2725K versus 1426K)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Handles wireless charging up to 40W
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
  • 2.1x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2729 and 1329 points
Reasons to consider the Honor 600
  • Comes with 800 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6200 mAh
  • Weighs 20 grams less
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200T and Honor 600 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
73.3
(Good)
Value Index
59.2
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Vivo X200T
vs
Honor 600

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.57 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1264 x 2728 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 460 ppi 458 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1600 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5000 nits 8000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate - 360 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 90.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.8%
PWM - 60 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
Vivo X200T
n/a
Honor 600
6219 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 160.01 mm (6.3 inches) 156 mm (6.14 inches)
Width 74.29 mm (2.92 inches) 74.7 mm (2.94 inches)
Thickness 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) 7.8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 205 g (7.23 oz) 185 g (6.53 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Purple White, Black, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200T
90.3%
Honor 600 +1%
90.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200T and Honor 600
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Max clock 3730 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925		 - 3 cores at 1.84 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-520)
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-720)
- 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-720)
L3 cache 12 MB 3 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 722
GPU shading units 1536 512
GPU clock 1612 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~1177.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200T and Honor 600
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200T +105%
2729
Honor 600
1329
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200T +105%
8430
Honor 600
4105
Compute Score (GPU)
Vivo X200T +193%
21754
Honor 600
7418
Compute Score (GPU) 21754 7418
Single-core score 2729 1329
Multi-core score 8430 4105
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X200T +91%
2725989
Honor 600
1426281
CPU 800906 473212
GPU 988549 321485
Memory 371345 295825
UX 565189 335759
Total score 2725989 1426281
Samples [6 tests] [2 tests]
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#124th place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200T
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (GTALVG)AnTuTu2594807
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-05 (Sachin)AnTuTu2688395
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-19 (Sagark)AnTuTu2472407
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-14 (adi)GeekBench CPU2729 / 8430
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-14 (adi)AnTuTu2908444
Add View all (7)
Honor 600
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-13 (ПавСл)AnTuTu1324118
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-22 (Mohamed)AnTuTu1426281
Add View all (2)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 3200 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM OriginOS 6 MagicOS 10
OS updates 5 years 6 years
Security updates - 6 years

Battery

Capacity 6200 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (70% in 30 min) Yes (71% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:54 hr 0:47 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 13:28 hr
Watching video - 22:06 hr
Gaming - 07:11 hr
Standby - 135 hr
General battery life
Vivo X200T
n/a
Honor 600
31:54 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 16384 x 12288
Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony IMX921 Samsung ISOCELL HP9
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.56 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP -
Aperture f/2.6 -
Focal length 70 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX882 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) -
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Samsung JD1 -
Sensor size 1/3.14" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung KD1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/2.88" (β‰ˆ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size - 0.61 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Depends on the region
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - No
Speakers test
Max loudness
Vivo X200T
n/a
Honor 600
87.8 dB

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced January 2026 April 2026
Release date February 2026 April 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $650 $649
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X200T is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
2 (66.7%)
1 (33.3%)
Total votes: 3

Related comparisons

1. Vivo X200T vs Vivo X200 FE
2. Vivo X200T vs Vivo X300
3. Vivo X200T vs Vivo iQOO 15
4. Vivo X200T vs OnePlus 15R
5. Vivo X200T vs Xiaomi 17
6. Honor 600 vs Honor 600 Pro
7. Honor 600 vs Honor 500
8. Honor 600 vs Vivo X300 FE
9. Honor 600 vs Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max
10. Honor 600 vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский