Xiaomi Redmi 9T vs Redmi 9C
Here we compared two budget smartphones: the 6.53-inch Xiaomi Redmi 9T (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 662) that was released on January 8, 2021, against the Xiaomi Redmi 9C, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G35 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi 9T
- 86% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (199K versus 106K)
- 47% higher pixel density (395 vs 269 PPI)
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Modern USB Type-C port
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 5 wireless networks
- Supports 18W fast charging
- Stereo speakers
- Has an ultra-wide angle camera lens
- More recent OS version: Android 12 versus 11
- Slow-motion recording at 120FPS
- Has a built-in infrared port
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below, but this has no bearing on our assessment methodology.
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Performance
CPU/GPU performance in apps and games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview score
Final comparison evaluation
Value for money
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money.
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Size | 6.53 inches | 6.53 inches |
Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 720 x 1600 pixels |
Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
PPI | 395 ppi | 269 ppi |
Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
Max rated brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
HDR support | No | No |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Tempered glass |
Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4% | 81.1% |
RGB color space | 96.4% | 92.9% |
PWM | 880 Hz | 17120 Hz |
Response time | 42 ms | 47 ms |
Contrast | 1868:1 | 881:1 |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
Height | 162.3 mm (6.39 inches) | 164.9 mm (6.49 inches) |
Width | 77.3 mm (3.04 inches) | 77 mm (3.03 inches) |
Thickness | 9.6 mm (0.38 inches) | 9 mm (0.35 inches) |
Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
Waterproof | No | No |
Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
Colors | Gray, Blue, Green, Orange | Gray, Blue, Green, Purple |
Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in home button | Yes, rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | MediaTek Helio G35 |
Max clock | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz |
CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.3 GHz: Cortex-A53 |
Lithography process | 11 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
Graphics | Adreno 610 | IMG PowerVR GE8320 |
GPU clock | 600 MHz | 680 MHz |
FLOPS | ~272 GFLOPS | ~54.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
AnTuTu Benchmark 9
CPU | 69124 | 32696 |
GPU | 32823 | 16440 |
Memory | 43460 | 23340 |
UX | 54969 | 35240 |
Total score | 199184 | 106859 |
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Max surface temperature | 45.3 °C | 41.5 °C |
Stability | 99% | - |
Graphics test | 2 FPS | - |
Graphics score | 372 | - |
PCMark 3.0
Web score | 5499 | - |
Video editing | 3681 | - |
Photo editing | 12777 | - |
Data manipulation | 5227 | - |
Writing score | 6638 | - |
Memory
RAM size | 4, 6 GB | 2, 3, 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory clock | 1800 MHz | - |
Channels | 2 | 2 |
Storage size | 64, 128 GB | 32, 64, 128 GB |
Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Memory card max size | Up to 512 GB | Up to 256 GB |
Software
Operating system | Android 10 (Can be upgraded to Android 12) | Android 10 (Can be upgraded to Android 11) |
ROM | MIUI 13 | MIUI 12 |
OS size | 21 GB | 18 GB |
Battery
Capacity | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Charge power | 18 W | 10 W |
Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
Replaceable | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Reverse charging | Yes | No |
Fast charging | Yes (25% in 30 min) | No |
Full charging time | 2:30 hr | 2:59 hr |
Web browsing | 16:36 hr | - |
Watching video | 15:38 hr | - |
Gaming | 06:28 hr | - |
Standby | 182 hr | - |
General battery life
Camera
Matrix | 48 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Image resolution | 8000 x 6000 | 4128 x 3096 |
Zoom | Digital | Digital |
Flash | LED | LED |
Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
8K video recording | No | No |
4K video recording | No | No |
1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
Slow motion | 120 FPS (720p) | No |
Angle of widest lens | 120° | - |
Lenses | 4 (48 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP) | 2 (13 MP + 2 MP) |
Wide (main) lens | - 48 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 8 micron - Sensor: 1/2", Samsung S5KGM1 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus |
- 13 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/3.1" (CMOS) - Phase autofocus |
Ultra-wide lens | - 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/4.0", OmniVision OV8856 (PureCel) |
- |
Macro lens | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Pixel size: 1.12 micron |
- 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
Depth lens | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
- |
Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode |
Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 2560 x 1960 |
Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
Focal length | 27 mm | - |
Pixel size | - | 1.12 microns |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
Connectivity
Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE, HID, A2DP |
USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
USB version | 2 | 2 |
USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
NFC* | Depends on the region | Yes |
Infrared port | Yes | No |
Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
eSIM support* | No | No |
Hybrid slot | No | No |
LTE Cat* | 13 | 4 |
5G support | No | No |
Sound
Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
FM radio | Yes | Yes |
Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
Category | Budget | Budget |
Announced | January 2021 | June 2020 |
Release date | January 2021 | September 2020 |
SAR (head) | 0.6 W/kg | 0.355 W/kg |
SAR (body) | 0.81 W/kg | 0.729 W/kg |
Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Fingerprint |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi 9T is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 372