Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A35 5G

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) that was released on September 21, 2023, against the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, which is powered by Exynos 1380 and came out 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
  • Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
  • Delivers 31% higher peak brightness (1340 against 1025 nits)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 25W)
  • 14% higher pixel density (446 vs 390 PPI)
  • Thinner bezels – 5% more screen real estate
  • Weighs 22 grams less
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
  • Shows 11% longer battery life (22:25 vs 20:13 hours)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
  • Waterproof body (IP67 classification)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
4 / 128 GB
83.7
(Good)
Value Index
63.5
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED Super AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.6 inches
Resolution 1220 x 2712 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 446 ppi 390 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10
Touch sampling rate - 240 Hz
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Gorilla Glass Victus Plus
Screen-to-body ratio 89.8% 84.8%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 96.6% 99.9%
PWM 713 Hz 240 Hz
Response time 1 ms 2 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1340 nits
1025 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 161.15 mm (6.34 inches) 161.7 mm (6.37 inches)
Width 74.24 mm (2.92 inches) 78 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 7.98 mm (0.31 inches) 8.2 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 209 g (7.37 oz)
Waterproof IP54 IP67
Advanced cooling - Vapor chamber
Rear material Plastic Glass
Frame material Plastic Plastic
Colors White, Black, Blue, Purple Black, Blue, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 Samsung Exynos 1380
Max clock 2400 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache - 4 MB
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 710 Mali-G68 MP5
GPU shading units 256 160
GPU clock 940 MHz 949 MHz
FLOPS ~481.3 GFLOPS ~303.7 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 2137 3033
Single-core score 1010 1006
Multi-core score 2842 2855
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 321088 311721
GPU - 89942
Memory 153212 136276
UX 244223 230273
Total score 718523 768212
Samples [12 tests] [23 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 99% 98%
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS
Graphics score 252 279
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 99% 99%
Graphics test 4 FPS -
Graphics score 792 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 11839 11340
Video editing 7161 7357
Photo editing 24619 25659
Data manipulation 10172 10930
Writing score 14428 16320

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-05 (Rodrigo)AnTuTu707607
📘 2026-06-16 (AmX)GeekBench CPU1025 / 3005
📘 2026-06-15 (AmX)GeekBench CPU1007 / 2951
📘 2026-06-14 (APTH)AnTuTu760946
📘 2026-06-07 (AmirX)AnTuTu798981
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-09 -> Mohammad.SodaeiAnTuTu775543
📘 2026-09-03 -> akash12ytAnTuTu714654
📘 2026-08-29 (TechAdv)AnTuTu653516
📘 2026-06-15 (Noyra)GeekBench CPU1007 / 2828
📘 2026-05-30 (Idkbro)CPU Throttle93%

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
Memory card No MicroSD
Memory card max size - Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 2.0 One UI 8.5
OS size 56 GB 28 GB
OS updates 2 years 4 years
Security updates 2 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 5100 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 67 W 25 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (49% in 15 min) Yes (52% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:42 hr 1:26 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:32 hr 08:47 hr
Watching video 11:56 hr 14:03 hr
Gaming 04:57 hr 05:56 hr
Standby 95 hr 106 hr
General battery life
22:25 hr

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 16384 x 12288 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital (lossless), 4x Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 118° 123°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 5 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.8
Focal length 23 mm -
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP3 Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN8
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Sensor Sony IMX355 GalaxyCore GC08A3
Sensor size 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.14 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP 5 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.4
Sensor Omnivision OV02B10 -
Sensor size 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.75 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 50
Preview - 52
Zoom - 71
Samples - Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy A35 5G from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 4160 x 3120
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.2
Sensor Omnivision OV16A1Q Samsung ISOCELL S5K3L6
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Depends on the region Depends on the region
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No Yes
LTE Cat* 18 18
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.9 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced September 2023 March 2024
Release date January 2024 March 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $305 $380
Successor - Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G - Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
SAR (head) - 0.44 W/kg
SAR (body) - 0.92 W/kg
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 67 W Not included
Further details
Notes on Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G:
    - There are two models of the phone (depending on the market): one with a dual physical SIM tray and the other with one physical SIM slot + an eSIM.
Notes on Galaxy A35 5G:
    - The 128 GB variant features UFS 2.2 memory, other models have UFS 3.1.
    - Only SM-A356E/DS and SM-A356B/DS models support two physical SIM cards.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display, camera, and gaming are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G. But if the connectivity and design are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
406 (42.9%)
540 (57.1%)
Total votes: 946

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!