Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T vs Samsung Galaxy A30s
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.3-inch Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 665) that was released on November 6, 2019, against the Samsung Galaxy A30s, which is powered by Exynos 7 Octa 7904 and came out 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
- 53% higher pixel density (409 vs 268 PPI)
- 36% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (350K versus 257K)
- Shows 13% longer battery life (19:50 vs 17:29 hours)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Delivers 23% higher peak brightness (599 against 487 nits)
- Slow-motion recording at 240FPS
- More energy-efficient CPU β Snapdragon 665
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A30s
- Super AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Weighs 31 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 720 x 1560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 409 ppi | 268 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.3% | 84.9% |
| RGB color space | 99.3% | 98% |
| PWM | Not detected | 240 Hz |
| Response time | 46.4 ms | 4 ms |
| Contrast | 1163:1 | β Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 161.1 mm (6.34 inches) | 158.5 mm (6.24 inches) |
| Width | 75.4 mm (2.97 inches) | 74.7 mm (2.94 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm (0.34 inches) | 7.8 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Gray, Blue | White, Black, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, rear | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 |
| Max clock | 2000 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) |
- 6 cores at 1.6 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 11 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | No |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 128 | 24 |
| GPU clock | 950 MHz | 770 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~243.2 GFLOPS | ~49.3 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 305 | 829 |
| Single-core score | 321 | 330 |
| Multi-core score | 1128 | 975 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 145861 | 109379 |
| GPU | 23955 | 14370 |
| Memory | 77887 | 70706 |
| UX | 102756 | 63446 |
| Total score | 350459 | 257901 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | Less than 3 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 5852 | - |
| Video editing | 4881 | - |
| Photo editing | 11723 | - |
| Data manipulation | 5081 | - |
| Writing score | 6462 | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-07-10 (bang) | AnTuTu 11 | 350459 |
| π 2025-10-29 (Baster) | AnTuTu 11 | 323556 |
| π 2024-08-10 (kyklisheee) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 305 |
| π 2024-08-10 (kyklisheee) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 321 / 1128 |
Samsung Galaxy A30s
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-25 (DELTA285120) | AnTuTu 12 | 381784 |
| π 2026-09-23 (Arsts) | AnTuTu 12 | 332563 |
| π 2026-07-06 (Akphne47) | AnTuTu 11 | 257901 |
Memory
| RAM size | 3 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 1866 MHz | 1933 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 256 GB | Up to 512 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 11) | Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 11) |
| ROM | MIUI 12.5 | One UI 3.1 |
| OS size | 8 GB | 10.9 GB |
| OS updates | - | 2 years |
| Security updates | - | 4 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 15 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 35 min) | Yes, Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (40% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:05 hr | 1:45 hr |
| Web browsing | 08:01 hr | 06:30 hr |
| Watching video | 11:48 hr | 11:04 hr |
| Gaming | 05:03 hr | 04:40 hr |
| Standby | 95 hr | 85 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8000 x 6000 | 5288 x 3968 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | 120 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120Β° | 123Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 48 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP 4) Depth: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 25 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP 3) Depth: 5 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 48 MP | 25 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGM1 | Samsung S5K2X5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2" (β 0.5 inch) | 1/2.8" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.9 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV8856 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/4" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 2 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | - |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV02A10 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/5" (β 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.75 micron | - |
| Stabilization | No | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 13 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4224 x 3136 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 28.21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV13855 | ISOCELL CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9" (β 0.34 inch) | 1/3.1" (β 0.32 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 12 | 10 |
| 5G support | No | - |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | November 2019 | August 2019 |
| Release date | December 2019 | September 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $216 | $310 |
| Successor | - | - Samsung Galaxy A37 5G |
| SAR (head) | 0.74 W/kg | 1.05 W/kg |
| SAR (body) | 1.3 W/kg | 1.54 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 131