Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
79
out of 100
VS
75
out of 100
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on April 24, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE, which is powered by Exynos 2400 and came out 4 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
- Comes with 2650 mAh larger battery capacity: 7550 vs 4900 mAh
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 45W)
- 10% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2292K versus 2087K)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- 16% higher pixel density (447 vs 385 PPI)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Handles wireless charging up to 15W
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
- Weighs 29 grams less
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| Size | 6.83 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2772 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 447 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1300 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3200 nits | 1900 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 480 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Gorilla Glass Victus Plus |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 89.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.1 mm (6.42 inches) | 161.3 mm (6.35 inches) |
| Width | 77.93 mm (3.07 inches) | 76.6 mm (3.02 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.98 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Green | White, Black, Gray, Blue, Yellow |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Good (3.19/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Excellent (A) · 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
| Max clock | 3210 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 825 | Xclipse 940 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1150 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2355.2 GFLOPS | ~3406.8 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 18498 | 18209 |
| Single-core score | 2002 | 2126 |
| Multi-core score | 7029 | 6910 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 660045 | 714011 |
| GPU | 807212 | 653511 |
| Memory | 351865 | 303868 |
| UX | 473419 | 416496 |
| Total score | 2292541 | 2087886 |
| Samples | [84 tests] | [48 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 82% | 62% |
| Graphics test | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1688 | 1840 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 29 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 1 | 33 FPS | 37 FPS |
| Section 2 | 29 FPS | 31 FPS |
| Section 3 | 24 FPS | 25 FPS |
| Graphics score | 7542 | 8302 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | 22 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 3705 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 15610 | 12949 |
| Video editing | 7765 | 8051 |
| Photo editing | 30492 | 34315 |
| Data manipulation | 14151 | 13202 |
| Writing score | 18243 | 23460 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#193rd place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-22 (Xiaomi Redmi turbo 4 pro) | AnTuTu 12 | 2599873 |
| 📘 2026-09-18 -> Jepbismud | AnTuTu 12 | 2451211 |
| 📘 2026-09-17 (Siyam Rahman) | AnTuTu 12 | 2509031 |
| 📘 2026-09-14 (Dat) | AnTuTu 12 | 2285610 |
| 📘 2026-09-08 (uniq) | AnTuTu 11 | 2306405 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-12 -> Viljami22 | AnTuTu 12 | 2321618 |
| 📘 2026-09-11 -> S25fe6833 | AnTuTu 12 | 2388378 |
| 📘 2026-08-17 (Neto) | AnTuTu 11 | 2303141 |
| 📘 2026-08-09 -> JamesPatrick | AnTuTu 11 | 2027080 |
| 📘 2026-08-08 (Ajr) | AnTuTu 11 | 2027080 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 3.0 | One UI 8.0 |
| OS size | - | 23.8 GB |
| OS updates | - | 7 years |
| Security updates | - | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7550 mAh | 4900 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 27 min) | Yes (52% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:00 hr | 1:10 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 2000 cycles |
| Web browsing | - | 13:29 hr |
| Watching video | - | 14:24 hr |
| Gaming | - | 06:03 hr |
| Standby | - | 87 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8160 x 6120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 960 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | - | 123° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 8 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) | 1/1.57" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 8 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | - | 75 mm |
| Sensor | - | OmniVision OV08A10 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4.4" (≈ 0.23 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | Samsung S5K3L6 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.14 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 150 |
| Zoom | - | 83 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S25 FE from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV20B | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2025 | September 2025 |
| Release date | April 2025 | September 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $649 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro. But if the connectivity is more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 15
