Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Note 14 Pro Plus 5G
78
out of 100
VS
65
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on April 24, 2025, against the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
- 2.3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2292K versus 1001K)
- Comes with 2440 mAh larger battery capacity: 7550 vs 5110 mAh
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 2.2
- Reverse charging feature
- 71% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2002 and 1174 points
- The phone is 7 months newer
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 90W)
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.83 inches | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2772 pixels | 1220 x 2712 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 447 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3200 nits | 3000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 480 Hz | 480 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 88.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | - | 99.1% |
| PWM | - | 120 Hz |
| Response time | - | 1 ms |
| Contrast | - | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.1 mm (6.42 inches) | 162.53 mm (6.4 inches) |
| Width | 77.93 mm (3.07 inches) | 74.67 mm (2.94 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.98 mm (0.31 inches) | 8.8 mm (0.35 inches) |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Green | Black, Green, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.61/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Good (C) · 90 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3210 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 1 core at 2.5 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 825 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1150 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2355.2 GFLOPS | ~537.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 18498 | 4464 |
| Single-core score | 2002 | 1174 |
| Multi-core score | 7029 | 3157 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 660045 | 388668 |
| GPU | 807212 | 177263 |
| Memory | 351865 | 186944 |
| UX | 473419 | 248908 |
| Total score | 2292541 | 1001783 |
| Samples | [84 tests] | [27 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 82% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 13 FPS | 3 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1688 | 362 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 29 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 33 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 29 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 24 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 7542 | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | 22 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 3705 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 15610 | 12562 |
| Video editing | 7765 | 7767 |
| Photo editing | 30492 | 22920 |
| Data manipulation | 14151 | 11977 |
| Writing score | 18243 | 15830 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#200th place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-27 (Mattzuuu) | AnTuTu 12 | 2550072 |
| 📘 2026-09-22 (Xiaomi Redmi turbo 4 pro) | AnTuTu 12 | 2599873 |
| 📘 2026-09-18 -> Jepbismud | AnTuTu 12 | 2451211 |
| 📘 2026-09-17 (Siyam Rahman) | AnTuTu 12 | 2509031 |
| 📘 2026-09-14 (Dat) | AnTuTu 12 | 2285610 |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-16 (Arkelian) | AnTuTu 12 | 1060019 |
| 📘 2026-09-12 (MishaDesher) | AnTuTu 12 | 1029598 |
| 📘 2026-08-11 (Đat) | AnTuTu 11 | 959029 |
| 📘 2026-07-24 (Super) | AnTuTu 11 | 1018676 |
| 📘 2026-07-16 (Zidan) | AnTuTu 11 | 919621 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
| OS size | - | 32 GB |
| OS updates | - | 2 years |
| Security updates | - | 2 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7550 mAh | 5110 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 120 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 27 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:00 hr | 0:21 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | - | 10:26 hr |
| Watching video | - | 13:31 hr |
| Gaming | - | 05:43 hr |
| Standby | - | 102 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 200 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 16320 x 12240 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | - | 120° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.65 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | Samsung S5KHP3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.14 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | - | 2 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.4 |
| Sensor | - | Omnivision OV02B |
| Sensor size | - | 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.75 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV20B | Omnivision OV20B40 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | April 2025 | September 2024 |
| Release date | April 2025 | January 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | $449 |
| Successor | - | - Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 120 W |
Further details
Notes on Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G:
- The black and blue models (glass back) are 8.75 mm thick and weigh 210.14g, while the purple model (eco-leather) is 8.85 mm and 205.13g.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 110