Home > Smartphone comparison > Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs IQOO Neo 10 (Global) – which one to choose?

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)

78 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
VS
78 out of 100
Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on April 24, 2025, against the Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global), which is powered by the same chip and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments (7)

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
Reasons to consider the Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 90W)
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro and Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
104.9
(Excellent)
Value Index
139.0
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
vs
IQOO Neo 10 (Global)

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.83 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2772 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 447 ppi 452 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (60-144 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 5500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Shield Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1% 89.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 163.1 mm (6.42 inches) 163.72 mm (6.45 inches)
Width 77.93 mm (3.07 inches) 75.88 mm (2.99 inches)
Thickness 7.98 mm (0.31 inches) 8.09 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 206 g (7.27 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP65
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors White, Black, Green Gray, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro and Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Max clock 3210 MHz 3210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4		 - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 825 Adreno 825
GPU shading units 1024 1024
GPU clock 1150 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS ~2355.2 GFLOPS ~2355.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro and Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 18498 18518
Single-core score 2002 2151
Multi-core score 7029 6825
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 660045 674929
GPU 807212 801298
Memory 351865 381888
UX 473419 532899
Total score 2292541 2391014
Samples [84 tests] [99 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 82% 76%
Graphics test 13 FPS 8 FPS
Graphics score 1688 1073
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 29 FPS 19 FPS
Section 1 33 FPS 21 FPS
Section 2 29 FPS 19 FPS
Section 3 24 FPS 16 FPS
Graphics score 7542 4971
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test 22 FPS -
Graphics score 3705 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15610 10240
Video editing 7765 6021
Photo editing 30492 25601
Data manipulation 14151 10644
Writing score 18243 13811
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (200th and 171st place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-27 (Mattzuuu)AnTuTu 122550072
📘 2026-09-22 (Xiaomi Redmi turbo 4 pro)AnTuTu 122599873
📘 2026-09-18 -> JepbismudAnTuTu 122451211
📘 2026-09-17 (Siyam Rahman)AnTuTu 122509031
📘 2026-09-14 (Dat)AnTuTu 122285610
Add View all (105)
Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-24 (heytempl)AnTuTu 112391065
📘 2026-09-22 (SEMTEX)AnTuTu 112483733
📘 2026-09-05 (diesel)AnTuTu 112360168
📘 2026-09-04 (D1saver)AnTuTu 112328560
📘 2026-08-20 (z2z3x5)AnTuTu 112299804
Add View all (112)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4800 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3.0 OriginOS 6

Battery

Capacity 7550 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 27 min) Yes
Full charging time 1:00 hr -
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony LYT-600 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX355 -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.14 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 -
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.5
Focal length 25 mm -
Sensor Omnivision OV20B Sony IMX480
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.09" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced April 2025 May 2025
Release date April 2025 June 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $349 $399
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 120 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro. It has a better gaming, software, and design.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
271 (60.9%)
174 (39.1%)
Total votes: 445

Related comparisons

1. Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global) vs Xiaomi Poco F7 (11)
2. Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global) vs Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (China) (5)
3. Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global) vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
4. Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global) vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro (2)
5. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 (1)
6. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G
7. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro (8)
8. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Infinix GT 30 Pro
9. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (6)
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Sakib August 4, 2025 at 10:06 AM
I think if anyone think I buy a midrange phone for paly game or photoshoot. He should buy redmi turbo 4 pro
0 Reply
Avatar
Roy June 18, 2025 at 03:46 PM
Neo 10 sampling rate is 360hz and bloody hell fix the release date
0 Reply
Avatar
Secert Man May 26, 2025 at 02:35 PM
Guys i think redmi tubro 4 pro is better the chip and cheap than neo 10 but orign os better than hyperos redmi 7550 battery
+22 Reply
Avatar
Aizen Sosuke May 24, 2025 at 03:59 PM
redmi turbo 4 pro got dolby atmos or nah? i'm planning to go all in on wuthering eaves at max settings, so i need to know if this two beasts can handle it. thanks for the answer
+8 Reply
Avatar
Fred October 6, 2025 at 05:33 PM
Redmi turbo 4 Pro has Dolby atmos
0 Reply
Avatar
oneplusDownfall May 11, 2025 at 05:32 PM
Feels like the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 needs more testing, ngl.
+12 Reply
Avatar
OnePlusGlazer May 4, 2025 at 08:46 AM
In my opinion neo 10 better
+37 Reply
EnglishРусский