ZTE Nubia Red Magic 12 Pro Plus vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch ZTE Nubia Red Magic 12 Pro Plus (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6) that was released on October 15, 2026, against the Vivo X300 Ultra, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 12 Pro Plus
  • Comes with 1800 mAh larger battery capacity: 8400 vs 6600 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 185 Hz
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)
  • 8% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 4102 and 3784 points
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 3.7x optical zoom
  • 18% higher pixel density (510 vs 431 PPI)
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 12 Pro Plus and Vivo X300 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
46.4
(Average)
Value Index
38.6
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.85 inches 6.82 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2688 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.8:9
PPI 431 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 185 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-144 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1900 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 5000 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, Dolby Vision
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Armor glass
Screen-to-body ratio 91.5% 90.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.8%
PWM - 110 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163 mm (6.42 inches) 162.98 mm (6.42 inches)
Width 76 mm (2.99 inches) 76.81 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.6 mm (0.34 inches) 8.49 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 223 g (7.87 oz) 232 g (8.18 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Active fan Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Blue White, Black, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3/5)
Drop resistance - Very good (B) Β· 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 12 Pro Plus and Vivo X300 Ultra
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 5010 MHz 4608 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 3 + 3) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 3 cores at 3.74 GHz:
- 3 cores at 4.03 GHz:
- 2 cores at 5.01 GHz:
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache - 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 2 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 850 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1450 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~4454.4 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 12 Pro Plus and Vivo X300 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 33108 27357
Single-core score 4102 3784
Multi-core score 13894 11394
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 1586980 1192014
GPU 1458511 1543938
Memory 579862 525105
UX 916272 986376
Total score 4541625 4247433
Samples Less than 3 [2 tests]
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (16th and 20th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 12 Pro Plus
No benchmark results yet
Vivo X300 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-17 (Razor97FF)Geekbench 6 CPU3742 / 11244
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-17 (Razor97FF)AnTuTu 124514826
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (mnkotyra12)AnTuTu 124156344
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (InphaseCosine18)AnTuTu 124098185
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Dipshit6769)AnTuTu 113835023

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 17 Android 16
ROM Redmagic OS 12 OriginOS 6
OS size - 60 GB
OS updates - 5 years
Security updates - 7 years

Battery

Capacity 8400 mAh 6600 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (80 W) Yes (40 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes (66% in 30 min)
Full charging time - 0:46 hr
Battery cycles - 1200 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 10:18 hr
Watching video - 20:51 hr
Gaming - 06:43 hr
Standby - 137 hr
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 16320 x 12256
Zoom Digital Optical, 3.7x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 122Β° 116Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 50 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.9
Focal length - 35 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50E40 Sony LYT-901
Sensor size 1/1.55" (β‰ˆ 0.65 inch) 1/1.12" (β‰ˆ 0.89 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 200 MP
Aperture - f/2.7
Focal length - 85 mm
Sensor - Samsung ISOCELL HP0
Sensor size - 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size - 0.56 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 13 mm 14 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50E40 Sony LYT-818
Sensor size 1/2.88" (β‰ˆ 0.35 inch) 1/1.28" (β‰ˆ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 1.22 micron
Stabilization Digital Optical
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Stabilization No -

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 180
Zoom - 172
Samples - Photo samples of Vivo X300 Ultra from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.5
Focal length - 24 mm
Sensor - Samsung ISOCELL JN5
Sensor size 1/2.8" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2026 March 2026
Release date October 2026 April 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $970 $1199
SAR (head) - 0.99 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.29 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 120 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display and camera are more important to you, then choose the Vivo X300 Ultra. But if the battery life and sound are more of a priority – go for the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 12 Pro Plus.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!