Kirin 9020 vs Kirin 8000

We compared two 8-core processors: HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (with Maleoon 920 graphics) and Kirin 8000 (). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9020
  • Performs 3.9x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 71%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 1383K vs 808K
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 8000
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Kirin 9020 +71%
1383793
808658
CPU 484142 269523
GPU 269177 112296
Memory 340806 211603
UX 289668 215236
Total score 1383793 808658
Samples [10 tests] [13 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Kirin 9020 +51%
1370
Multi-Core Score
Kirin 9020 +85%
4446
2399
Asset compression 169.6 MB/sec 129.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 129.9 pages/sec 58.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 126.6 Mpixels/sec 87.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 85.1 images/sec 49.9 images/sec
HDR 118.5 Mpixels/sec 77.9 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.7 images/sec 7.98 images/sec
Photo processing 43.4 images/sec 23.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.21 Mpixels/sec 3.69 Mpixels/sec
Samples 7 tests 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 9020 +111%
4881
2309
Background blur 6.04 images/sec 4.24 images/sec
Face detection 3.28 images/sec 2.43 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.32 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.26 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 20.6 Gpixels/sec 6.71 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 568.2 FPS 601.9 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 6 tests 3 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Kirin 9020 +45%
454
Score 454 314
Stability - 98%
Graphics test 3 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 9466
Video editing score - 6509
Data manipulation score - 8311
Photo editing score - 18282
Writing score - 12099
Phones tested - 2 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-13 (AndreyK)AnTuTu 111372431
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> LeofMateAnTuTu 111291607
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-22 (A_s_t_r_a)AnTuTu 111328024
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-04-18 (Antonio)AnTuTu 111395526
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-02-25 (BlizardRx)AnTuTu 111337422
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-24 (ุฃุจู’ุง ุตูŽุงู„ูุญู)AnTuTu 12863749
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-21 (auron)Geekbench 6 CPU936 / 2600
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-27 (ุฃุจู’ุง ุตูŽุงู„ูุญู)Geekbench 6 CPU909 / 2399
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-25 (ุฃุจู’ุง ุตูŽุงู„ูุญู)Geekbench 6 GPU2309
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-23 (ุฃุจู’ุง ุตูŽุงู„ูุญู)Geekbench 6 CPU909 / 2382

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Kirin 9020 and Kirin 8000

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.5 GHz โ€“ TaiShan V121
3x 2.15 GHz โ€“ TaiShan V120
4x 1.6 GHz โ€“ Taishan-Little
1x 2.4 GHz โ€“ 1xA77 H
3x 2.19 GHz โ€“ 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz โ€“ A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2500 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 10 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Manufacturing SMIC SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Maleoon 920 -
Architecture Maleoon -
GPU frequency 840 MHz 864 MHz
Pipelines 4 -
Shading units 256 -
Total shaders 1024 -
FLOPS 1720.3 Gigaflops 442.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Balong 6000 Balong
4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps -
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.4 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2024 October 2024
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number Hi36C0V110 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
12 (80%)
3 (20%)
Total votes: 15

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 8000 and Kirin 9020, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!