Kirin 9020 vs Apple A18

We compared the 8-core HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (Maleoon 920) with the older 6-core Apple A18 (Apple A18 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9020
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 60 GB/s)
Pros of Apple A18
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 7 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~77%)
  • 62% higher CPU clock speed (4050 vs 2500 MHz)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 43%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1972K vs 1383K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1383793
Apple A18 +43%
1972476
CPU 484142 611649
GPU 269177 589953
Memory 340806 181123
UX 289668 589751
Total score 1383793 1972476
Samples [10 tests] [29 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1370
Apple A18 +150%
3431
Multi-Core Score
4446
Apple A18 +94%
8638
Asset compression 169.6 MB/sec 286.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 129.9 pages/sec 184.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 126.6 Mpixels/sec 201.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 85.1 images/sec 297.2 images/sec
HDR 118.5 Mpixels/sec 279.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.7 images/sec 36.2 images/sec
Photo processing 43.4 images/sec 90 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.21 Mpixels/sec 8.68 Mpixels/sec
Samples 7 tests 6 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
4881
Apple A18 +474%
28010
Background blur 6.04 images/sec 49.2 images/sec
Face detection 3.28 images/sec 71.8 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.24 Gpixels/sec 0.86 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.32 Gpixels/sec 1.14 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.26 Gpixels/sec 1.44 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 20.6 Gpixels/sec 77.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 568.2 FPS 2811.1 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 6 tests 4 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Apple A18 +248%
1579
Score 454 1579
Stability - 75%
Graphics test 3 FPS 12 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 6750
Graphics test - 26 FPS
Section 1 - 31 FPS
Section 2 - 26 FPS
Section 3 - 20 FPS

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
HiSilicon Kirin 9020
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-13 (AndreyK)AnTuTu 111372431
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 -> LeofMateAnTuTu 111291607
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 (A_s_t_r_a)AnTuTu 111328024
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-18 (Antonio)AnTuTu 111395526
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-25 (BlizardRx)AnTuTu 111337422
Apple A18
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-30 (Dddd)AnTuTu 111905485
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (Aj)AnTuTu 111949745
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (vovachips)AnTuTu 111842572
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-03 (iTzRageeh)Geekbench 6 CPU3531 / 9122
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-03 (iTzRageeh)AnTuTu 112045650

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Kirin 9020 and Apple A18

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.5 GHz – TaiShan V121
3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan V120
4x 1.6 GHz – Taishan-Little
2x 4.05 GHz – Everest
4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2500 MHz 4050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 10 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 9 W
Manufacturing SMIC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Maleoon 920 Apple A18 GPU
Architecture Maleoon Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 840 MHz 1490 MHz
Pipelines 4 5
Shading units 256 128
Total shaders 1024 640
FLOPS 1720.3 Gigaflops 1907 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 60 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 -
Max camera resolution - 1x 48MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Balong 6000 Snapdragon X71 5G
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2024 September 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number Hi36C0V110 APL1V08
Successor - - Apple A19

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
29 (70.7%)
12 (29.3%)
Total votes: 41

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Apple A18 and Kirin 9020, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!