Dimensity 9500 vs M5 (iPad)

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (Mali-G1 Ultra MP12) with the newer 10-core Apple M5 (iPad) (custom) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  • Performs 27% better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
  • Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 11 score – 3760K vs 3396K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple M5 (iPad)
  • Supports 79% higher memory bandwidth (153 against 85.3 GB/s)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (4610 vs 4210 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
3760662
3396957
CPU 1048345 965229
GPU 1432351 1313129
Memory 476680 458312
UX 803286 660296
Total score 3760662 3396957
Samples [119 tests] [3 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
M5 (iPad) +25%
4193
Multi-Core Score
M5 (iPad) +53%
15913
Asset compression 397.3 MB/sec 576.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 292.7 pages/sec 374.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 328.1 Mpixels/sec 380 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 234.3 images/sec 452.7 images/sec
HDR 328.1 Mpixels/sec 549.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 40.9 images/sec 55 images/sec
Photo processing 109.9 images/sec 161.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 10.3 Mpixels/sec 18.3 Mpixels/sec
Samples 29 tests 4 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
M5 (iPad) +198%
76009
Background blur 47.2 images/sec 153 images/sec
Face detection 26.1 images/sec 177.6 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.78 Gpixels/sec 2.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.31 Gpixels/sec 2.84 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.68 Gpixels/sec 5.76 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.31 Gpixels/sec 0.95 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 91.9 Gpixels/sec 188 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3324.6 FPS 6580.5 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 14 tests 4 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
M5 (iPad) +32%
4104
Score 3119 4104
Stability 57% 71%
Graphics test 23 FPS 30 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
M5 (iPad) +30%
17310
Score 13319 17310
Graphics test 51 FPS 66 FPS
Section 1 55 FPS 88 FPS
Section 2 52 FPS 63 FPS
Section 3 43 FPS 46 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14375 -
Video editing score 5995 -
Data manipulation score 12159 -
Photo editing score 34571 -
Writing score 22695 -
Phones tested 4 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (Asura)CPU Throttle70%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix)CPU Throttle81%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Asura)CPU Throttle63%
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (chapix)AnTuTu3935655
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 -> Rlamac012AnTuTu3729488
Apple M5 (iPad)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (patrick)AnTuTu3511739
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-12 (LBWNB)AnTuTu3396957
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-17 -> LiberoGeekBench GPU76909
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-17 -> LiberoGeekBench CPU4193 / 15913
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-06 (Toxicaliv)GeekBench GPU76009

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9500 and M5 (iPad)

CPU

Architecture 1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
4x 4.61 GHz –
6x 2.95 GHz –
Cores 8 10
Frequency 4210 MHz 4610 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB 192 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 16 MB
L3 cache 16 MB -
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 -
Architecture Valhall 5th gen -
GPU frequency 1716 MHz 1620 MHz
Pipelines 12 -
Shading units 128 -
Total shaders 1536 -
FLOPS 5271.5 Gigaflops 4147.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 100 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 8x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 153 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 NVMe
Max display resolution - 2752 x 2064
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP -
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - C1X
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10700 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced September 2025 October 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6993 T8142
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9500 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
124 (50.2%)
123 (49.8%)
Total votes: 247

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of M5 (iPad) and Dimensity 9500, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Scython October 18, 2025 at 07:06 AM
Even that, M series is not meant for smartphone, care abouttt battery life and portability
+8 Reply
Avatar
Ved June 23, 2026 at 09:04 AM
This soc is capable of multitasking
0 Reply
SoC Fan October 17, 2025 at 10:07 AM
I think a chip specially made for pad a one that focuses on smartphone is not really of the same level as the one for pad can go for more power as it's got more bigger place for the architecture and bigger battery as well as better cooling. We cannot use m5 for smartphones without compromise but can use 9500 for tabs without any issues. Though it's able to slightly give competition to this m5 chip is more than enough of a Achievement for both Elite gen 2 af 9500 chips
+13 Reply
Samsung trash February 12, 2026 at 11:46 AM
If lagging 49% in multicore and 19% in Single core makes you think its giving M5 "competition" then you are just a delusional, Do you even know a leap from 3nm to 2nm will only guarantee 30% better performance, and M5 is already 49% better, so do your math. Its not better its generations better.
+2 Reply