Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Kirin 9050 Pro

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (Adreno 740) with the newer 9-core HiSilicon Kirin 9050 Pro (Maleoon 955) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9050 Pro
  • Higher GPU frequency (~54%)
  • Performs 54% better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • Has 1 more cores
  • Shows better (up to 8%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1902K vs 1757K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1902468
CPU 553922 579000
GPU 434880 543500
Memory 311861 440168
UX 456381 319800
Total score 1757044 1902468
Samples [238 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 218.9 MB/sec -
HTML 5 Browser 145.2 pages/sec -
PDF Renderer 168.3 Mpixels/sec -
Image detection 133 images/sec -
HDR 167.2 Mpixels/sec -
Background blur 18.8 images/sec -
Photo processing 34.5 images/sec -
Ray tracing 5.78 Mpixels/sec -
Samples 132 tests -
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 12.3 images/sec -
Face detection 5.1 images/sec -
Horizon detection 0.53 Gpixels/sec -
Edge detection 0.56 Gpixels/sec -
Gaussian blur 0.36 Gpixels/sec -
Feature matching 0.12 Gpixels/sec -
Stereo matching 32.6 Gpixels/sec -
Particle physics 2177.4 FPS -
API OpenCL -
Samples 66 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1092 -
Stability 67% -
Graphics test 8 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 5312 -
Stability 67% -
Graphics test 20 FPS -
Section 1 23 FPS -
Section 2 20 FPS -
Section 3 17 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 3667 -
Stability 45% -
Graphics test 21 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 13957 -
Video editing score 7265 -
Data manipulation score 14272 -
Photo editing score 32179 -
Writing score 17828 -
Phones tested 9 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 90 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 56 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Shadowgun Legends 118 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 120 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro
1116 x 2480
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (Lello75)CPU Throttle86%
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (Azure)AnTuTu 121945847
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (Brbrpotopim)AnTuTu 121997922
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Баня)AnTuTu 121780927
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 -> KarlderaLGeekbench 6 CPU2065 / 5707
HiSilicon Kirin 9050 Pro
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Kirin 9050 Pro

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X3
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
1x 3.1 GHz –
2x 2.7 GHz –
4x 2.2 GHz –
2x 1.75 GHz –
Cores 8 9
Frequency 3200 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 8 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count 16 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8.5 W -
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 740 Maleoon 955
Architecture Adreno 700 Maleoon
GPU frequency 680 MHz 1050 MHz
Pipelines 3 6
Shading units 512 256
Total shaders 1536 1536
FLOPS 2089 Gigaflops 3225.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Da Vinci

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR6
Memory frequency 4200 MHz -
Bus 4x 16 Bit -
Max bandwidth 67.2 Gb/s -
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 4.1, UFS 5.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X70 Balong
4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10000 Mbps -
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.3 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced November 2022 September 2026
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8550-AB -
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 official site -
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 -
Further details
Notes on Snapdragon 8 Gen 2:
    - There's also the "Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy," which only differs by having a 160 MHz higher CPU clock and a 39 MHz higher GPU clock, resulting in 2208.8 GFLOPS for the GPU. Generally, you won't notice this difference in real-life usage, including games.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
4 (25%)
12 (75%)
Total votes: 16

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9050 Pro and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!