Exynos 2600 vs Dimensity 9600M

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2600 (Samsung Xclipse 960) with the newer 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9600M (Mali-G1 Ultra MP12) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2600
  • Has a smaller size transistor (2 versus 3 nm)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Performs 33% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
  • Higher GPU frequency (~75%)
  • Shows better (up to 27%) AnTuTu 11 score – 4011K vs 3161K
  • 11% higher CPU clock speed (4210 vs 3800 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
3161126
4011932
CPU 1023425 1043247
GPU 1236436 1510982
Memory 384525 667254
UX 516740 790449
Total score 3161126 4011932
Samples [20 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
10904
Asset compression 459.4 MB/sec -
HTML 5 Browser 328.1 pages/sec -
PDF Renderer 345 Mpixels/sec -
Image detection 259.1 images/sec -
HDR 344.2 Mpixels/sec -
Background blur 41.7 images/sec -
Photo processing 97.1 images/sec -
Ray tracing 12.2 Mpixels/sec -
Samples 8 tests -
Compute Score (GPU)
27019
Background blur 43.4 images/sec -
Face detection 20.2 images/sec -
Horizon detection 1.03 Gpixels/sec -
Edge detection 1.41 Gpixels/sec -
Gaussian blur 2.05 Gpixels/sec -
Feature matching 0.28 Gpixels/sec -
Stereo matching 95 Gpixels/sec -
Particle physics 4524 FPS -
API Vulkan -
Samples 7 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 3109 -
Graphics test 23 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 11935 -
Graphics test 45 FPS -
Section 1 51 FPS -
Section 2 44 FPS -
Section 3 39 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 21279 -
Video editing score 8171 -
Data manipulation score 16909 -
Photo editing score 40764 -
Writing score 30248 -
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2600
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Artem)AnTuTu3113554
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (Phrog)GeekBench CPU3167 / 11029
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (Phrog)AnTuTu3161126
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-29 (David Vasic)AnTuTu3317117
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-26 (Simon)AnTuTu3215235
MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2600 and Dimensity 9600M

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro
6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro
1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3800 MHz 4210 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.3-A
L1 cache 192 KB 192 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 16 MB
Process 2 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 9 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 960 Mali-G1 Ultra MP12
Architecture RDNA 4 Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 980 MHz 1716 MHz
Pipelines 8 12
Shading units 448 128
Total shaders 1792 1536
FLOPS 7024.6 Gigaflops 5271.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.4
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) AI engine with 32K MAC NPU MediaTek NPU 990
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS 100 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 85.3 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 -
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5410 -
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 14790 Mbps Up to 10700 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4900 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2025 September 2026
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9965 MT6994
Official page Samsung Exynos 2600 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9600M and Exynos 2600, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!