Exynos 2600 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4)

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2600 (Samsung Xclipse 960) with the older 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) (Adreno 830) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2600
  • Performs 2.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Has 8 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (2 versus 3 nm)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4)
  • 14% higher CPU clock speed (4320 vs 3800 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~12%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 1023425 893474
GPU 1236436 1133808
Memory 384525 427210
UX 516740 671910
Total score 3161126 3126402
Samples [20 tests] [541 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 459.4 MB/sec 367.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 328.1 pages/sec 223.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 345 Mpixels/sec 257 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 259.1 images/sec 234.4 images/sec
HDR 344.2 Mpixels/sec 315.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 41.7 images/sec 32.7 images/sec
Photo processing 97.1 images/sec 90.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.2 Mpixels/sec 12.4 Mpixels/sec
Samples 8 tests 148 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 43.4 images/sec 45.3 images/sec
Face detection 20.2 images/sec 21.6 images/sec
Horizon detection 1.03 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.41 Gpixels/sec 0.91 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 2.05 Gpixels/sec 1.75 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.28 Gpixels/sec 0.33 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 95 Gpixels/sec 96.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 4524 FPS 3848 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 7 tests 100 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 3109 2386
Graphics test 23 FPS 18 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 11935 10874
Graphics test 45 FPS 41 FPS
Section 1 51 FPS 47 FPS
Section 2 44 FPS 41 FPS
Section 3 39 FPS 35 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 5664
Stability - 51%
Graphics test - 33 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 21279 21945
Video editing score 8171 8458
Data manipulation score 16909 16086
Photo editing score 40764 39118
Writing score 30248 22647
Phones tested Less than 3 36 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2600
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> SerostAnTuTu 123359689
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-26 (gollim)AnTuTu 123269772
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Pires)AnTuTu 123302245
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-20 (Shaco)AnTuTu 123216468
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Artem)AnTuTu 113113554
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4)
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-05 -> swag420AnTuTu 123135800
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Gun park)AnTuTu 123085318
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Mรกrcio correia)AnTuTu 123718254
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-04 (potatowan)Geekbench 7 CPU2791 / 10180
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-03 (Apple Slayer)AnTuTu 123529678

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2600 and Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4)

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.8 GHz โ€“ C1-Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz โ€“ C1-Pro
6x 2.75 GHz โ€“ C1-Pro
2x 4.32 GHz โ€“ Oryon (Phoenix L)
6x 3.53 GHz โ€“ Oryon (Phoenix M)
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3800 MHz 4320 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache 192 KB 192 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 12 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Process 2 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 960 Adreno 830
Architecture RDNA 4 Adreno 800
GPU frequency 980 MHz 1100 MHz
Pipelines 8 3
Shading units 448 512
Total shaders 1792 1536
FLOPS 7024.6 Gigaflops 3379.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) AI engine with 32K MAC NPU Hexagon
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 5300 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 84.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2540
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5410 Snapdragon X80
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 14790 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4900 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2025 October 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9965 SM8750-AB
Official page Samsung Exynos 2600 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Further details
Notes on Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4):
    - The SM8750-AC model has a higher frequencyโ€”4,470 MHz for performance cores versus 4,320 MHz in the SM8750-AB and SM8750-3-AB modelsโ€”and its GPU is 100 MHz faster.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
430 (44.6%)
534 (55.4%)
Total votes: 964

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) and Exynos 2600, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
fufufafa July 3, 2026 at 02:49 AM
Exynosking more powerful
+6 Reply
Avatar
ihhh555 March 2, 2026 at 09:59 AM
Exynos clear winner more powerful
+70 Reply
Avatar
anon March 6, 2026 at 08:12 AM
Only time will tell. The drivers and support are what matters.
+47 Reply