Exynos 2600 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2600 (Samsung Xclipse 960) with the newer 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series (Adreno 840 (8 CUs)) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2600
  • Performs 2.9x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (2 versus 3 nm)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series
  • 21% higher CPU clock speed (4610 vs 3800 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~22%)
  • Shows better (up to 12%) AnTuTu 11 score – 3531K vs 3161K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 1023425 1072515
GPU 1236436 1108332
Memory 384525 543094
UX 516740 807437
Total score 3161126 3531378
Samples [20 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 459.4 MB/sec -
HTML 5 Browser 328.1 pages/sec -
PDF Renderer 345 Mpixels/sec -
Image detection 259.1 images/sec -
HDR 344.2 Mpixels/sec -
Background blur 41.7 images/sec -
Photo processing 97.1 images/sec -
Ray tracing 12.2 Mpixels/sec -
Samples 8 tests Less than 3
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 43.4 images/sec -
Face detection 20.2 images/sec -
Horizon detection 1.03 Gpixels/sec -
Edge detection 1.41 Gpixels/sec -
Gaussian blur 2.05 Gpixels/sec -
Feature matching 0.28 Gpixels/sec -
Stereo matching 95 Gpixels/sec -
Particle physics 4524 FPS -
API Vulkan -
Samples 7 tests Less than 3

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 3109 -
Graphics test 23 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 11935 -
Graphics test 45 FPS -
Section 1 51 FPS -
Section 2 44 FPS -
Section 3 39 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
Web score 21279 -
Video editing score 8171 -
Data manipulation score 16909 -
Photo editing score 40764 -
Writing score 30248 -
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2600
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (Shaco)AnTuTu 123216468
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Artem)AnTuTu 113113554
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (Phrog)Geekbench 6 CPU3167 / 11029
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (Phrog)AnTuTu 113161126
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-29 (David Vasic)AnTuTu 113317117
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (El Bicho)Geekbench 6 CPU3349 / 10094
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Mj)AnTuTu 113457874

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2600 and Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro
6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro
2x 4.61 GHz – Oryon Gen 3 Prime
6x 3.63 GHz – Oryon Gen 3 Performance
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3800 MHz 4610 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB 192 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 12 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 12 MB
Process 2 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W -
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 960 Adreno 840 (8 CUs)
Architecture RDNA 4 Adreno 800
GPU frequency 980 MHz 1200 MHz
Pipelines 8 2
Shading units 448 512
Total shaders 1792 1024
FLOPS 7024.6 Gigaflops 2457.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.4
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) AI engine with 32K MAC NPU Hexagon
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 5300 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 84.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2540
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5410 Snapdragon X85
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 14790 Mbps Up to 12500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4900 Mbps Up to 3700 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2025 August 2026
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9965 SM8850-1-AB
Official page Samsung Exynos 2600 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
13 (72.2%)
5 (27.8%)
Total votes: 18

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series and Exynos 2600, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!