Exynos 2600 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 5

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2600 (Samsung Xclipse 960) with the older 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (Adreno 829) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2600
  • Performs 2.8x better in floating-point computations
  • Has 10 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  • Has a smaller size transistor (2 versus 3 nm)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Supports 11% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 76.8 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
  • Higher GPU frequency (~25%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
3161126
CPU 1023425 905159
GPU 1236436 1061006
Memory 384525 388817
UX 516740 702233
Total score 3161126 3057215
Samples [20 tests] [91 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 459.4 MB/sec 377.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 328.1 pages/sec 221 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 345 Mpixels/sec 268.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 259.1 images/sec 269.9 images/sec
HDR 344.2 Mpixels/sec 306 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 41.7 images/sec 35.9 images/sec
Photo processing 97.1 images/sec 87.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.2 Mpixels/sec 12 Mpixels/sec
Samples 8 tests 20 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
27019
Background blur 43.4 images/sec 38 images/sec
Face detection 20.2 images/sec 18.7 images/sec
Horizon detection 1.03 Gpixels/sec 0.71 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.41 Gpixels/sec 0.85 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 2.05 Gpixels/sec 1.41 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.28 Gpixels/sec 0.27 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 95 Gpixels/sec 79.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 4524 FPS 3028.3 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 7 tests 10 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 3109 1823
Graphics test 23 FPS 14 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 11935 9094
Graphics test 45 FPS 35 FPS
Section 1 51 FPS 40 FPS
Section 2 44 FPS 35 FPS
Section 3 39 FPS 29 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
20423
Web score 21279 18849
Video editing score 8171 7194
Data manipulation score 16909 15237
Photo editing score 40764 40238
Writing score 30248 25119
Phones tested Less than 3 Less than 3

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2600
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 -> SerostAnTuTu 123359689
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (gollim)AnTuTu 123269772
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Pires)AnTuTu 123302245
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (Shaco)AnTuTu 123216468
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (Artem)AnTuTu 113113554
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (F2I4)AnTuTu 123102899
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Feary7)AnTuTu 123338986
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (dpicugin)AnTuTu 123071402
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Ketrox)AnTuTu 122895140
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Macro_peek)AnTuTu 123189922

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2600 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 5

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro
6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro
2x 3.8 GHz – Oryon Prime
6x 3.32 GHz – Oryon Performance
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3800 MHz 3800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB 192 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 12 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 6 MB
Process 2 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 9 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 960 Adreno 829
Architecture RDNA 4 Adreno 800
GPU frequency 980 MHz 1225 MHz
Pipelines 8 2
Shading units 448 512
Total shaders 1792 1024
FLOPS 7024.6 Gigaflops 2508.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.4
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) AI engine with 32K MAC NPU Hexagon
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 76.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2540
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5410 Snapdragon X80
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 14790 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4900 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2025 November 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9965 SM8845
Official page Samsung Exynos 2600 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
228 (77.3%)
67 (22.7%)
Total votes: 295

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 and Exynos 2600, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Wuejrfj January 8, 2026 at 06:02 AM
I heard Qualcomm is considering a Samsung variant of 8Elite gen5 in this comparison with the same clock speed shows that their 2nm and HPB solution is actually good, can't wait for the actual irl performance
+7 Reply
Avatar
cpu sweat January 6, 2026 at 08:46 PM
I did not excpect that samsung will release such a powerfull chip.
+11 Reply
Avatar
Steve February 22, 2026 at 01:04 PM
They will!!! Exynos 2600 is a monster!!!
+3 Reply