Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 – an 8-core chipset that was announced on June 26, 2018, and is manufactured using a 14-nanometer process technology. It has 4 cores Kryo 250 Gold (Cortex-A73 at 1800 MHz and 4 cores Kryo 250 Silver (Cortex-A53) at 1800 MHz.
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
AnTuTu 8
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
118310
CPU |
60244 |
GPU |
10499 |
Memory |
27587 |
UX |
11175 |
Total score |
118310 |
GeekBench 5
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Image compression |
81 Mpixels/s |
Face detection |
11.3 images/s |
Speech recognition |
18.95 words/s |
Machine learning |
13.05 images/s |
Camera shooting |
8.73 images/s |
HTML 5 |
1.05 Mnodes/s |
SQLite |
426.3 Krows/s |
Smartphones
Click on the device name to view detailed information
Specifications
Detailed specifications of the Snapdragon 632 SoC with Adreno 506 graphics
Architecture |
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Gold (Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
Cores |
8 |
Frequency |
1800 MHz |
Instruction set |
ARMv8-A |
L1 cache |
128 KB |
Process |
14 nanometers |
Transistor count |
2 billion |
TDP |
7 W |
GPU name |
Adreno 506 |
Architecture |
Adreno 500 |
GPU frequency |
725 MHz |
Execution units |
1 |
Shading units |
96 |
FLOPS |
124.8 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version |
1.0 |
OpenCL version |
2.0 |
DirectX version |
12 |
Memory type |
LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency |
933 MHz |
Bus |
1x 32 Bit |
Max bandwidth |
7.46 Gbit/s |
Max size |
6 GB |
Neural processor (NPU) |
Hexagon 546 |
Storage type |
eMMC 5.1 |
Max display resolution |
1920 x 1200 |
Max camera resolution |
1x 40MP, 2x 13MP |
Video capture |
4K at 30FPS |
Video playback |
4K at 30FPS |
Video codecs |
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
Audio codecs |
192 кГц/24-бит, Dolby 5.1 |
Modem |
X9 LTE |
4G support |
LTE Cat. 7 |
5G support |
No |
Download speed |
Up to 300 Mbps |
Upload speed |
Up to 150 Mbps |
Wi-Fi |
5 |
Bluetooth |
5.0 |
Navigation |
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS |
Comparison with competitors