Lenovo Tab M11 vs Infinix Xpad 30 Pro
Here we compared two tablets: the 11-inch Lenovo Tab M11 (with MediaTek Helio G88) that was released on January 9, 2024, against the Infinix Xpad 30 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate and came out 2 years and 9 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Lenovo Tab M11
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- Thinner bezels – 10.3% more screen real estate
- Smaller footprint: 11% more compact case (58.1 vs 65.3 square inches)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Infinix Xpad 30 Pro
- 74% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (588K versus 339K)
- Comes with 1160 mAh larger battery capacity: 8200 vs 7040 mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 13
- More energy-efficient CPU – Helio G200 Ultimate
- Delivers 23% higher peak brightness (502 against 408 nits)
- 33% higher pixel density (274 vs 206 PPI)
- Reverse charging feature
- 66% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 721 and 435 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11 inches | 11 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels | 1600 x 2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 206 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | - |
| Max rated brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Panda MN228 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 93.7% | 83.4% |
| RGB color space | 99.1% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 52 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1078:1 | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 166.31 mm (6.55 inches) | 254.04 mm (10 inches) |
| Width | 225.26 mm (8.87 inches) | 165.55 mm (6.52 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.15 mm (0.28 inches) | 6.6 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 465 g (16.4 oz) | 476 g (16.79 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP52 | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Green | Silver, Gray, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 375 cm2 (58.1 inches2) | 421 cm2 (65.2 inches2) |
| Repairability | Excellent (4.03/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Bad (E) · 1 drops | - |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (140th and 107th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (110th and 82nd place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G88 | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Max clock | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 12 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 48 | 64 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~96 GFLOPS | ~140.8 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1094 | 1677 |
| Single-core score | 435 | 721 |
| Multi-core score | 1457 | 1891 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 140153 | 221007 |
| GPU | 26892 | 50452 |
| Memory | 68773 | 147869 |
| UX | 103186 | 169254 |
| Total score | 339004 | 588582 |
| Samples | [14 tests] | Less than 3 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| ROM | ZUI 15.1 | XOS 16.3 |
| OS size | 18 GB | - |
| OS updates | 7 years | 1 year |
| Security updates | - | 2 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7040 mAh | 8200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 20 W | 18 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 40 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:47 hr | 3:03 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | - | 09:01 hr |
| Watching video | - | 10:47 hr |
| Gaming | - | 06:02 hr |
| Standby | - | 173 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | - | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | - |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 7 | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | January 2024 | September 2026 |
| Release date | April 2024 | September 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $195 |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Accelerometer - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 18 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Infinix Xpad 30 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1