Galaxy Tab A11 vs Infinix Xpad 30 Pro
53
out of 100
VS
55
out of 100
Here we compared two tablets: the 8.7-inch Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (with MediaTek Helio G99) that was released on September 12, 2025, against the Infinix Xpad 30 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate and came out 1 year after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
- Much smaller footprint: 38% more compact case (40.8 vs 65.3 square inches)
- Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Ready for eSIM technology
- Weighs 141 grams less
Reasons to consider the Infinix Xpad 30 Pro
- Has a 2.3 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 3100 mAh larger battery capacity: 8200 vs 5100 mAh
- 53% higher pixel density (274 vs 179 PPI)
- Delivers 14% higher peak brightness (502 against 441 nits)
- Reverse charging feature
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 8.7 inches | 11 inches |
| Resolution | 800 x 1340 pixels | 1600 x 2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 179 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | - |
| Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Panda MN228 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.9% | 83.4% |
| RGB color space | 78.6% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 29 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1461:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Xpad 30 Pro
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
Galaxy Tab A11
8.7″ (5:3 ratio) = 33.4 in2
~62% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 211 mm (8.31 inches) | 254.04 mm (10 inches) |
| Width | 124.7 mm (4.91 inches) | 165.55 mm (6.52 inches) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 inches) | 6.6 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 335 g (11.82 oz) | 476 g (16.79 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Gray | Silver, Gray, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 263 cm2 (40.8 inches2) | 421 cm2 (65.2 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.72/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) · 104 drops | - |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (122nd and 107th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (95th and 82nd place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 64 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~140.8 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1314 | 1677 |
| Single-core score | 732 | 721 |
| Multi-core score | 2049 | 1891 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 250145 | 221007 |
| GPU | 43322 | 50452 |
| Memory | 116331 | 147869 |
| UX | 135748 | 169254 |
| Total score | 545546 | 588582 |
| Samples | [178 tests] | Less than 3 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10433 | - |
| Video editing | 4521 | - |
| Photo editing | 14671 | - |
| Data manipulation | 7520 | - |
| Writing score | 11923 | - |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-09 (ctoyu7665) | AnTuTu 11 | 521495 |
Infinix Xpad 30 Pro
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 16 |
| ROM | One UI 8.0 | XOS 16.3 |
| OS size | 14 GB | - |
| OS updates | 5 years | 1 year |
| Security updates | - | 2 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5100 mAh | 8200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 15 W | 18 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (51% in 60 min) | Yes (50% in 40 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:28 hr | 3:03 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | - | 09:01 hr |
| Watching video | - | 10:47 hr |
| Gaming | - | 06:02 hr |
| Standby | - | 173 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | - |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 13 | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2025 | September 2026 |
| Release date | October 2025 | September 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $180 | $195 |
| SAR (body) | 0.29 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Accelerometer - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 18 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the display and camera are more important to you, then choose the Infinix Xpad 30 Pro. But if the performance, battery life, connectivity, software, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1