Infinix Xpad 30 Pro vs Honor Pad X9

55 out of 100
Infinix Xpad 30 Pro
VS
48 out of 100
Honor Pad X9

Here we compared two tablets: the 11-inch Infinix Xpad 30 Pro (with MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate) that was released on September 7, 2026, against the Honor Pad X9, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 and came out 3 years and 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
4 / 128 GB

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Infinix Xpad 30 Pro
  • Comes with 950 mAh larger battery capacity: 8200 vs 7250 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 13
  • 28% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (588K versus 461K)
  • Delivers 11% higher peak brightness (502 against 454 nits)
  • 35% higher pixel density (274 vs 203 PPI)
  • Reverse charging feature
  • 51% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 721 and 477 points
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad X9
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1

Review

Evaluation of Infinix Xpad 30 Pro and Honor Pad X9 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 128 GB
VS
4 / 128 GB
95.3
(Very good)
Value Index
82.6
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Tablet:
vs

Display

Type TFT LCD TFT LCD
Size 11 inches 11.5 inches
Resolution 1600 x 2560 pixels 1200 x 2000 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 5:3
PPI 274 ppi 203 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate - Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 500 nits 450 nits
HDR support No No
Screen protection Panda MN228 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 83.4% 84.1%
Screen space comparison
Pad X9
11.5″ (5:3 ratio) = 58.3 in2
Xpad 30 Pro
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~7% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
502 nits
454 nits

Design and build

Height 254.04 mm (10 inches) 267.3 mm (10.52 inches)
Width 165.55 mm (6.52 inches) 167.4 mm (6.59 inches)
Thickness 6.6 mm (0.26 inches) 6.9 mm (0.27 inches)
Weight 476 g (16.79 oz) 499 g (17.6 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Silver, Gray, Purple Gray
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 421 cm2 (65.2 inches2) 447 cm2 (69.3 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio
83.4%
Pad X9 +1%
84.1%
Tablet Ranking (107th and 134th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (82nd and 106th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Infinix Xpad 30 Pro and Honor Pad X9
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
Max clock 2200 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76
- 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53
- 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A73
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 686
GPU
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Adreno 610
GPU shading units 64 128
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1260 MHz
FLOPS ~140.8 GFLOPS ~322.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Infinix Xpad 30 Pro and Honor Pad X9
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
721
477
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
1891
1551
Compute Score (GPU)
Xpad 30 Pro +194%
1677
570
Compute Score (GPU) 1677 570
Single-core score 721 477
Multi-core score 1891 1551
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
588582
461236
CPU 221007 191663
GPU 50452 29731
Memory 147869 110054
UX 169254 129788
Total score 588582 461236
Samples Less than 3 [37 tests]
PCMark 3.0
8206
Web score - 8739
Video editing - 4586
Photo editing - 15530
Data manipulation - 7170
Writing score - 8896

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 13
ROM XOS 16.3 MagicOS 7.1
OS updates 1 year -
Security updates 2 years -

Battery

Capacity 8200 mAh 7250 mAh
Max charge power 18 W 22.5 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes No
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (50% in 40 min) Yes (34% in 30 min)
Full charging time 3:03 hr 2:04 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 09:01 hr 08:56 hr
Watching video 10:47 hr 11:02 hr
Gaming 06:02 hr 07:03 hr
Standby 173 hr 155 hr
General battery life
26:56 hr
25:36 hr

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 5 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 2592 x 1944
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No No
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 5 MP
Camera features - -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 5 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Sensor size 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus - Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 5 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 2592 x 1944
Aperture - f/2.2
Sensor size 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.1
Bluetooth features - LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers Stereo 6.0
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Category Mid-range Budget
Announced September 2026 July 2023
Release date September 2026 July 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $195 $230
Sensors - Accelerometer
- Compass
- Accelerometer
Bundled charger Yes, 18 W Not included
Further details
Notes on Pad X9:
    - The memory card slot is available only in the 4G model.
    - In some European countries, the package includes a charger, while others do not.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Infinix Xpad 30 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!