OnePlus Pad Go 2 vs OnePlus Pad 3
Here we compared two tablets: the 12.1-inch OnePlus Pad Go 2 (with MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra) that was released on December 17, 2025, against the OnePlus Pad 3, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad Go 2
- Shows 90% longer battery life (33:39 vs 17:40 hours)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Much smaller footprint: 15% more compact case (79.5 vs 94.1 square inches)
- Reverse charging feature
- Weighs 78 grams less
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad 3
- 3.3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3317K versus 1011K)
- Has a 1.1 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 2090 mAh larger battery capacity: 12140 vs 10050 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 33W)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 inches | 13.2 inches |
| Resolution | 1980 x 2800 pixels | 2400 x 3392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 7:5 | 7:5 |
| PPI | 283 ppi | 315 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 900 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 900 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | 60-144 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.1% | 87.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 3
13.2″ (7:5 ratio) = 82.4 in2
Pad Go 2
12.1″ (7:5 ratio) = 69.2 in2
~19% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 266.01 mm (10.47 inches) | 289.61 mm (11.4 inches) |
| Width | 192.77 mm (7.59 inches) | 209.66 mm (8.25 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.83 mm (0.27 inches) | 5.97 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 597 g (21.06 oz) | 675 g (23.81 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Purple | Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 513 cm2 (79.5 inches2) | 607 cm2 (94.1 inches2) |
| Repairability | Good (3.49/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Bad (E) · 10 drops | - |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (73rd and 36th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (55th and 27th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max clock | 2500 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 655 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1047 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~536.1 GFLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 2561 | 24691 |
| Single-core score | 1003 | 3003 |
| Multi-core score | 3112 | 9307 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 348327 | 1061523 |
| GPU | 129975 | 1152696 |
| Memory | 216404 | 369778 |
| UX | 316570 | 733417 |
| Total score | 1011282 | 3317414 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [4 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 82% |
| Graphics test | - | 19 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 2544 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 45 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 50 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 46 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 40 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 11865 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 9698 | 13279 |
| Video editing | 5011 | 6340 |
| Photo editing | 19645 | 25239 |
| Data manipulation | 8103 | 15200 |
| Writing score | 13352 | 18634 |
Recent User Tests
OnePlus Pad Go 2
No benchmark results yet
OnePlus Pad 3
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-03 (Ayush) | AnTuTu 12 | 3239353 |
| 📘 2026-09-09 (Harsh) | AnTuTu 11 | 3242325 |
| 📘 2026-07-10 (Даниил Oneplus Fan) | AnTuTu 11 | 3286274 |
| 📘 2026-06-20 (SusGo0d) | AnTuTu 11 | 3188009 |
| 📘 2026-04-03 -> Afera666 | AnTuTu 11 | 3612786 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | OxygenOS 16 | Oxygen OS 15 |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 10050 mAh | 12140 mAh |
| Max charge power | 33 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (33% in 30 min) | Yes (40% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:50 hr | 1:29 hr |
| Battery cycles | 800 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 11:12 hr | 06:01 hr |
| Watching video | 13:48 hr | 12:27 hr |
| Gaming | 07:33 hr | 07:31 hr |
| Standby | 215 hr | 77 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | - |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | No |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 8.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | - |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | December 2025 | June 2025 |
| Release date | December 2025 | June 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $649 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the OnePlus Pad 3 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 13