Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 vs OnePlus Pad Go 2
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 (with MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra) that was released on June 5, 2025, against the OnePlus Pad Go 2, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra and came out 7 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- Much smaller footprint: 18% more compact case (65.6 vs 79.5 square inches)
- Weighs 87 grams less
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad Go 2
- 77% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1011K versus 570K)
- Has a 1.1 inches larger screen size
- Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
- Delivers 58% higher peak brightness (835 against 528 nits)
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- Comes with 1050 mAh larger battery capacity: 10050 vs 9000 mAh
- Shows 8% longer battery life (33:39 vs 31:12 hours)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Supports higher wattage charging (33W versus 18W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11 inches | 12.1 inches |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels | 1980 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 7:5 |
| PPI | 274 ppi | 283 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (30-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 900 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 87.1% |
| Display features | - | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 92.5% | - |
| PWM | 14999 Hz | - |
| Response time | 29 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1421:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad Go 2
12.1″ (7:5 ratio) = 69.2 in2
Redmi Pad 2
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~27% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 254.58 mm (10.02 inches) | 266.01 mm (10.47 inches) |
| Width | 166.04 mm (6.54 inches) | 192.77 mm (7.59 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.36 mm (0.29 inches) | 6.83 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 510 g (17.99 oz) | 597 g (21.06 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Green, Purple | Silver, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 423 cm2 (65.5 inches2) | 513 cm2 (79.5 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | Good (3.49/5) |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) · 156 drops | Bad (E) · 10 drops |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (104th and 77th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (79th and 58th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1047 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~536.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1260 | 2561 |
| Single-core score | 725 | 1003 |
| Multi-core score | 1980 | 3112 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 219481 | 348327 |
| GPU | 48406 | 129975 |
| Memory | 146071 | 216404 |
| UX | 156511 | 316570 |
| Total score | 570469 | 1011282 |
| Samples | [74 tests] | Less than 3 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10522 | 9698 |
| Video editing | 5262 | 5011 |
| Photo editing | 17642 | 19645 |
| Data manipulation | 7941 | 8103 |
| Writing score | 11407 | 13352 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-04-24 (Mentos_uzbek) | Battery life | SOT 11:48 / 41:40 |
OnePlus Pad Go 2
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | OxygenOS 16 |
| OS size | 24 GB | - |
| OS updates | 0 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 9000 mAh | 10050 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 33 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | - | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (17% in 30 min) | Yes (33% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:59 hr | 1:50 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | 800 cycles |
| Web browsing | 08:38 hr | 11:12 hr |
| Watching video | 09:17 hr | 13:48 hr |
| Gaming | 06:30 hr | 07:33 hr |
| Standby | 233 hr | 215 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A3 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Focal length | 17 mm | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | - |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | June 2025 | December 2025 |
| Release date | June 2025 | December 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $299 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 15 W | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Redmi Pad 2:
- Gyroscope, GPS and compass are only available on the 4G model.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the OnePlus Pad Go 2 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 5