Vivo Pad 5 Pro vs iPad mini 8.3" (7th Gen, 2024)
Here we compared two tablets: the 13-inch Vivo Pad 5 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400) that was released on April 21, 2025, against the Apple iPad mini 8.3" (7th Gen, 2024), which is powered by Apple A17 Pro and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo Pad 5 Pro
- Comes with 6972 mAh larger battery capacity: 12050 vs 5078 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Has a 4.7 inches larger screen size
- 58% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2825K versus 1788K)
- Delivers 30% higher peak brightness (669 against 514 nits)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (66W versus 20W)
- Thinner bezels – 9.8% more screen real estate
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
Reasons to consider the Apple iPad mini 8.3" (7th Gen, 2024)
- Fingerprint scanner
- Much smaller footprint: 54% more compact case (40.8 vs 89 square inches)
- 14% higher pixel density (327 vs 286 PPI)
- Weighs 342 grams less
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 9% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2972 and 2738 points
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13 inches | 8.3 inches |
| Resolution | 2064 x 3096 pixels | 1488 x 2266 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| PPI | 286 ppi | 327 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max rated brightness | 1200 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6% | 77.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 99.5% | 99.4% |
| PWM | Not detected | Not detected |
| Response time | 48 ms | 35 ms |
| Contrast | 1366:1 | 1221:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 5 Pro
13″ (3:2 ratio) = 78 in2
iPad mini 8.3" (7th Gen, 2024)
8.3″ (3:2 ratio) = 31.8 in2
~145% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 289.56 mm (11.4 inches) | 195.4 mm (7.69 inches) |
| Width | 198.32 mm (7.81 inches) | 134.8 mm (5.31 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.64 mm (0.26 inches) | 6.3 mm (0.25 inches) |
| Weight | 635 g (22.4 oz) | 293 g (10.34 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Gray, Blue, Pink | Gold, Gray, Blue, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 574 cm2 (89 inches2) | 263 cm2 (40.8 inches2) |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.73/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Average (D) · 52 drops |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (31st and 61st place)
Android Tablet Ranking (#23rd place)
iPad Ranking (#17th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Apple A17 Pro |
| Max clock | 3630 MHz | 3780 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 6 (2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 4 cores at 2.11 GHz: Sawtooth - 2 cores at 3.78 GHz: Everest |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | Apple Neural Engine |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | 6 core Apple GPU |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 1398 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~2147.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24474 | 25633 |
| Single-core score | 2738 | 2972 |
| Multi-core score | 8542 | 7397 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 889187 | 571661 |
| GPU | 966129 | 477510 |
| Memory | 370036 | 217930 |
| UX | 600124 | 521861 |
| Total score | 2825476 | 1788962 |
| Samples | [51 tests] | [3 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 79% |
| Graphics test | - | 10 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 1350 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 22 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 27 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 21 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 16 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 5750 |
Recent User Tests
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
No benchmark results yet
Apple iPad mini 8.3" (7th Gen, 2024)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-06-17 (Markyhuhu) | AnTuTu | 1679642 |
| 📘 2026-03-13 (mint.ai) | GeekBench GPU | 25633 |
| 📘 2026-03-13 (mint.ai) | GeekBench CPU | 2897 / 7192 |
| 📘 2026-03-13 (mint.ai) | AnTuTu | 1831753 |
| 📘 2026-02-04 (Helios_Qu) | AnTuTu | 1788962 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | NVMe |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | iPadOS 18 (Can be upgraded to iPadOS 26.5) |
| ROM | OriginOS 5 | - |
| OS size | 17 GB | 14 GB |
| OS updates | - | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 12050 mAh | 5078 mAh |
| Max charge power | 66 W | 20 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (80% in 75 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 2:00 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | - | 07:39 hr |
| Watching video | - | 11:07 hr |
| Gaming | - | 04:43 hr |
| Standby | - | 161 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Aperture | - | f/2.4 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | eSIM |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | April 2025 | October 2024 |
| Release date | April 2025 | October 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $539 | $499 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Barometer - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 66 W | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Pad 5 Pro:
- The 128GB model has UFS 3.1, while 256GB and 512GB use UFS 4.1.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo Pad 5 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1