Vivo Pad 5 Pro vs Oppo Pad 3 Pro
Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 13-inch Vivo Pad 5 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400) that was released on April 21, 2025, against the Oppo Pad 3 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo Pad 5 Pro
- Has a 0.9 inch larger screen size
- Comes with 2540 mAh larger battery capacity: 12050 vs 9510 mAh
- 21% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2825K versus 2333K)
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- 26% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2738 and 2179 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Pad 3 Pro
- Weighs 49 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13 inches | 12.1 inches |
| Resolution | 2064 x 3096 pixels | 2120 x 3000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 7:5 |
| PPI | 286 ppi | 304 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1200 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 540 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6% | 85.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 99.5% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 48 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1366:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad 5 Pro
13″ (3:2 ratio) = 78 in2
Pad 3 Pro
12.1″ (7:5 ratio) = 69.2 in2
~12% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 289.56 mm (11.4 inches) | 268.66 mm (10.58 inches) |
| Width | 198.32 mm (7.81 inches) | 195.06 mm (7.68 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.64 mm (0.26 inches) | 6.49 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 635 g (22.4 oz) | 586 g (20.67 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Gray, Blue, Pink | Gold, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 574 cm2 (89 inches2) | 524 cm2 (81.3 inches2) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (31st and 46th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (23rd and 32nd place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3630 MHz | 3400 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 750 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 903-1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24474 | - |
| Single-core score | 2738 | 2179 |
| Multi-core score | 8542 | 6500 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 889187 | 643259 |
| GPU | 966129 | 818824 |
| Memory | 370036 | 348314 |
| UX | 600124 | 522888 |
| Total score | 2825476 | 2333285 |
| Samples | [51 tests] | [298 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 95% |
| Graphics test | - | 12 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 1641 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 32 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 35 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 32 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 27 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 8285 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | - | 94% |
| Graphics test | - | 28 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 4700 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| ROM | OriginOS 5 | ColorOS 14.1 |
| OS size | 17 GB | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 12050 mAh | 9510 mAh |
| Max charge power | 66 W | 67 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (65% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 0:56 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 23 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | - | f/2.3 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2025 | October 2024 |
| Release date | April 2025 | October 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $539 | $500 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 66 W | Yes, 67 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 5 Pro:
- The 128GB model has UFS 3.1, while 256GB and 512GB use UFS 4.1.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera, performance, gaming, battery life, software, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Vivo Pad 5 Pro. But if the display is more of a priority – go for the Oppo Pad 3 Pro.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 19